Abstract:PurposePower use widely exists in buyer–supplier relationships (BSRs). Different directions of power use (i.e. buyer's power use and supplier's power use) intertwining with different types of power (i.e. coercive and noncoercive power) make it insufficient to regard power use as a single construct when examining its effect on a firm's following response. Besides, interdependence structure characterized by joint dependence and dependence asymmetry may influence the effect of a specific power use by shaping the firm's interpretation and cognition toward the relationship. Specifically, this study examines how four types of power use a buyer facing and an interdependence structure with its supplier affect its specific investments to the supplier.Design/methodology/approachThis study tests the proposed relationships using regression analysis, based on data from 240 manufacturing firms in China on their perceived relationships with their major suppliers.FindingsResults show that buyer's coercive power use (BCP) negatively affects buyer's specific investments while noncoercive power use (BNP) does not play a significant role. Both supplier's coercive power use (SCP) and noncoercive power use (SNP) are positively related to buyer's specific investments. Joint dependence positively moderates the effect of BNP and dependence asymmetry negatively moderates the effects of BCP and SNP on buyer's specific investments.Originality/valueThis study contributes to the literature on power use by identifying different types of power use and their different roles in influencing buyer's specific investments. The study also contributes to the literature on interdependence structure by demonstrating the different roles of joint dependence and dependence asymmetry.

A Study of Power Allocation in Resources-Based Organizations

Study on the Mechanism of Corporate Soft Power

Kinship - Oriented or Ability - Oriented——an Empirical Study on the Power Allocation Mechanism of the Family - Controlled Public Firms

Study on the Content,Process and Mechanism of Corporate Soft Power

Studying on the Mechanism that Corporate Social Responsibility How to Enhance Corporate Soft Power:Hoiley Group Case Study

Attaining Corporate Competitiveness Through Soft Power

Structural Power Distribution Between Family and Non-Family Executives and Innovation Performance in Family Firms

Research on Resources Allocation of Public Universities and Its Institutional Choice

Allocation of Decision Rights Between the Parent Company and Its Subsidiaries

Corporate Cash Reserves and Corporate Governance Mechanism: the Empirical Study of the Chinese Publicly Traded Corporations

Power Source and Its Effect on Customer–supplier Relationships: an Empirical Study in Yangtze River Delta

A Study of Employee Stock Ownership Based on Strategic Management: A Perspective of Resource-Based View

The Effect of Power Use on Specific Investments: the Moderating Role of Interdependence Structure

Investor Protection, Corporate Characteristics and Allocation of Control Rights

Supply Chain Power Configurations and Their Relationship with Performance

The power source of Chinese state-owned enterprise leaders, investigation of local core officials, and corporate investment behavior

The Allocation Mechanism of Authority and Accountability in Chinese Government Hierarchies: A Case Study of the “earmarked Project System”

On Allocation of State Property Right Resources of China's Modern Enterprise

Study on Differences of Operating-Asset Allocation of China’s State-Owned and Private Enterprises

Analysis on Reason of Dispersed Power in the Organization

Analyzing Corporate Governance Policy on the Allocation of Resource:Based on the IPO Firms during 2006～2010