Domains and facets of quality of care scale for disabled people using focus groups
Jian-ting Tao,Xin-lin Chen,Yuan-tao Hao,Jian-hua Ruan,Ji-qian Fang,Qi Tian,Qiu-xiang Ai
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3321/j.issn:1673-8225.2008.15.042
2008-01-01
Abstract:AIM: People have not deeply studied the quality of care for the disabled at home and abroad now. There is not quality of care (QOC) scale for them. This study explored the QOC for disabled in China by focus group. METHODS: The experiment was conducted from December 2006 to January 2007. Thirty-nine subjects including disabled people, watchers or family members and professional caretakers were selected and divided into seven focus groups: intellectual disabled (n =6), physical disabled (n =6), Parkinson disease (n =3), hearing disability (n =6), vision disability (n =6), relatives or watchers (n =5), and professional (n =7, including doctors and nurses). The disabled who ①aged 18 to 80 years, ②were diagnosed as disability by medical institutions, and ③were of Guangzhou domicile population were selected. And the disabled people with serious cognitive impairment, communication problems, depression, dementia, and unwilling to participate in the discussion were excluded. Each group was interviewed following a semi-structured procedure. Videotape and written records were used and the data were analyzed by qualitative and quantitative analysis methods. RESULTS: Thirty-nine subjects were all involved in the result analysis. The QOC scale involved 17 aspects and 6 domains such as physical health domain including ability, severity of disability and so on; psychological health domain including mental status, etc; social function domain including interpersonal relationship, social support, etc; environment domain including living environment, barrier-free facilities/assistive devices, the availability and quality of health and social services, financial state, entertainment and recreation and transportation; social participation domain including employment, education/social security, respect, and discrimination and transportation; policy and social institutions domain. CONCLUSION: ①The 17 facets in QOC scale for disabled are similar to the QOL scale for normal people. The difference is that disabled people pay more attention to the availability and quality of health and social services, barrier-free facilities/assistive devices, and policy. ②The focus group can be a practical method of studying the quality of care for disabled people, and the results are very helpful to establish the domains and facets of QOC scale for the disabled.