Abstract:According to Article 10 of the 1982 Constitution,a dualist structure of land ownership was established in China.Such an institutional arrangement was originally intended to better protect rural land and the interest of peasants,but has now degenerated into the most serious discrimination against the peasants in China.Not only is the use of rural land strictly regulated,but the title of rural land cannot be transferred without being first expropriated by government and converted into state land.This article discusses the nature of the collective ownership of China's rural land,and aims to reconstruct a more peaceful and just land management regime. In contrast to the city land owned by the state or the whole people,the collectively owned rural land may acquire a degree of substantive ownership.Nevertheless,lessons from China's history indicate that the right to use the rural land shall ultimately resides in individual peasants or their households,and such individualized right shall be respected and protected by law.China's rural land has long been greatly devalued,however,by the legal restrictions on the right to use rural land.The irrational and discriminative regulatory regime over China's rural land needs fundamental reform,so as to return to the farmers the collective land property right as conferred by the 1982 Constitution,and to disconnect land expropriation with the urbanization process. In fact,the substantive issue associated with urbanization is the urban planning and the examination and approval of the land use change by local governments.In this respect,the existing planning process in China,seriously deficient in democratic participation,is often carried out at the mercy of official whim.The American experience of bringing rule of law to the local zoning and review processes may provide some inspiration for China.To assure the rationality of local planning and related examination and approval,it is indispensible to bring democracy to the legislative and civil participatory processes.It is also necessary to establish an appropriate judicial review mechanism to safeguard the legality of the purpose and procedure of planning.

Misreading and Rational Cognition of Forest Right

The Logic Conversion and Scheme Formation about the Automatic Renewal of Residential Land Use Right

On Clause Design for Land Contracting Management Right in Real Right Law

On the Real- Rightize of the Contractual Operation Right of Rural Land

Reconstruction of China’s Farmland Rights System Based on the ‘trifurcation of Land Rights’ Reform

The Impact of Urbanization on Farmland: is Division of Right to Contracted Management of Land a Reasonable Way Out?

Collective Forests and the Community at the Legal Frontier of Property Rights Reforms in China

Study on the Subject of Family Contract and Management Right and the Relationship among Members in Rural Households

Research on transfer of contractual operation right of rural land

Study on Perfecting the Circulation of Rural Land Contracted Management Right System and Solving Existing Legal Problems

Collective Action in China’s Recent Collective Forestry Property Rights Reform

An Analysis on the Nature of Chinese Land Property Rights and Its Trajectory of Reform

Collective land system in China: Congenital flaw or acquired irrational weakness?

Reference and Verification on the Theory of Common-pool Resources Self-Governance-From Perspective of Research and Practice of Forest Management in China

Paradox of Collective Ownership of China's Rural Land and Its Resolution

Effect of Land Property Rights on Forest Resources in Southern China

Legalization of the Use Rights Market of Collective Construction Land:The Strategic Choice of Chinese Land System Reform

Study on Land Ownership Adjustment in Rural Land Consolidation in China

Rethinking the Mode and Method of Defining the Object of Quasi-Real Right

The Exploring of the Regulation and Compensation Mechanism about Ecological Commonweal Forest after Collective Forest Tenure Reform

The Change of the Deposition Patterns on Land Rights and Incomes based on the Cognitive Right Theory：An Case Study of the Original Rural Land in Shenzhen