Abstract:OBJECTIVE:To explore the value of diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) and perfusion weighted imaging (PWI) in identifying benign and malignant renal masses and differentiating the histological types of renal masses. METHODS:Fifteen healthy volunteers and 46 patients with renal masses proven by pathology, including clear cell carcinomas (n = 18), papillary carcinomas (n = 8), chromophobe carcinomas (n = 7) and angiomyolipomas (n = 13), were examined with DWI and PWI scan at 3.0 T MRI. ANOVA was employed to compare the values of transfer constant (K(trans)), rate constant of backflux (Kep) and extra-vascular extra-cellular space fractional volume (Ve) proceeded by PWI and the value of ADC resulted from DWI between normal kidney and different histological types of renal masses. Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve was used to analyze and compare the diagnostic value of the methods of PWI and DWI in differentiating benign and malignant renal masses. RESULTS:The ADC value of normal renal parenchyma was (2.10 ± 0.24) × 10⁻³ mm²/s, which was statistically higher than benign and malignant renal masses (P < 0.05). The ADC value of benign masses was statistically higher than that of all histological types of malignant masses (P < 0.05). Among three histological types of malignancies, clear cell carcinoma showed the statistically highest ADC value (P < 0.05). But the difference between papillary carcinoma and chromophobe carcinoma had no statistical significance (P > 0.05).Values of K(trans), Kep and Ve between normal renal parenchyma and different histological types of renal masses had statistical differences.Values of K(trans) and Ve in three histological types of malignant renal masses were statistically higher than those of benign renal masses.Kep value of clear cell carcinoma was significantly higher than that of benign renal masses (P < 0.05).However, other histological types of malignant masses had no significant difference with benign masses.For three malignant masses, K(trans) of clear cell carcinoma, papillary carcinoma and chromophobe carcinoma were (0.85 ± 0.27), (0.51 ± 0.04) and (0.39 ± 0.05)/min respectively. All values gradually reduced. And the differences were statistically significant (P < 0.05). The Ve value of renal clear cell carcinoma was statistically higher than that of papillary carcinoma (P < 0.05). ROC curve was used to analyze and compare the diagnostic value of PWI versus DWI in differentiating benign and malignant renal masses. The K(trans) of benign and malignant renal masses had the largest AUC (AUC = 0.937) at a threshold of 0.38/min. And there were a sensitivity of 87.9% and a specificity of 85.7%. The AUC of ADC was 0.823, sensitivity 72.7% and specificity 92.9%. The ADC threshold for differentiating benign from malignant masses was 1.40 × 10⁻³ mm²/s; AUC of Ve 0.803, sensitivity 78.8% and specificity 71.4%, a threshold of 0.29/min; Kep showed lower diagnostic value. CONCLUSION:3.0 T MRI DWI and PWI can effectively differentiate benign and different histological types of malignant renal masses. And PWI is superior to DWI in differentiating benign and malignant renal masses.K(trans) with the largest AUC showed the highest diagnostic value. And ADC is also irreplaceable in providing the information of cellular structural features and the movement of water diffusion.

Normal Appearance of Large Field Diffusion Weighted Imaging on 3.0T MRI

Diffusion Weighted Imaging and Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Value in Differential Diagnosis of Lymph Node Lesions

Age-related Changes of Bone Marrow of Normal Adult Man on Diffusion Weighted Imaging.

Large field diffusion weighted imaging on 3. 0T MR: Initial study

Normal Appearances of Whole Body Diffusion Weighted Imaging at 3.0T MR Scanner and Initial Clinical Study

Diagnostic Value of 3.0T MR Diffusion-Weighted Imaging in Prostate Cancer

[Diffusion Weighted Imaging and Perfusion Weighted Imaging in the Differential Diagnosis of Benign and Malignant Renal Masses on 3.0 T MRI].

Application of MR Diffusion Weighted Imaging of Prostate

Diagnostic value of 3. 0T MR diffusion-weighted imaging in prostate cancer

Differentiation of benign and malignant lesions of the prostate by MR diffusion weighted imaging

Effect Of Intravenous Gadolinium-Dtpa On Diffusion-Weighted Imaging For Prostate Lesions And Normal Tissue At 3.0-Tesla Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Value of MR Diffusion Weighted Imaging in Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer

Age-related Changes of Prostate Peripheral Zone in Healthy Adults: Evaluation by Apparent Diffusion Coefficient

Diagnosis value of apparent diffusion coefficient of magnetic resonance imaging in grading of prostate cancer

Prostatic abscess:MRI findings and ADC value quantitative analysis

Comparison of 1.5T and 3.0T diffusion-weighted imaging in the application of the complex adnexal masses in female patients

Diffusion-weighted Imaging: Effects of Intravascular Contrast Agents on Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Measures of Breast Malignancies at 3 Tesla.

Diffusion-weighted Single-Shot Echo Planar MR Imaging of Normal Human Prostate Using Different B Values

Diagnostic criterion of diffusion-weighted imaging for prostatic peripheral zone cancer

Short-term Reproducibility of Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Estimated from Diffusion-Weighted MRI of the Prostate

Biexponential Apparent Diffusion Coefficients Values in the Prostate: Comparison among Normal Tissue, Prostate Cancer, Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia and Prostatitis