Effects of the Coadministration of Propofol and Small-Dose Ketamine for Conization of Cervix

靳艳卿,马正良

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1000-2065.2008.09.022

2008-01-01

Abstract:Objective To compare the anesthetic effects between the coadministration of propofol and small-dose ketamine and the use of propofol alone for conization of the cervix.Methods Eighty outpatients scheduled for elective conization of cervix under anesthesia were randomly allocated to two groups(n=40 each): group A,to receive propofol anesthesia;group B,under propofol-ketamine anesthesia.In group A,the anesthesia was induced by slowly giving a certain dose of propofol.In group B,ketamine 0.2 mg/kg i.v.was given before the use of intravenous propofol.When the patients lost consciousness,and half of the dosage of propofol had been given,the operation was started.Additional dose of propofol 1.0 mg/kg could be administered to maintain anesthesia,when necessary.Another dose of ketamine 0.2 mg·kg-1 was given,if the operation time was beyond 15 min in group B.Observations were made over body weight and age,vital signs,operation time,recovery time,amount of propofol consumed,responsive body movements and side effects.Results No significant differences were found between the two groups in operation time and recovery time,but the dose of propofol was significantly bigger in group A than in group B [(30.7±9.9) ml vs.(24.2±6.5) ml,P0.01].The frequency of body movement was higher in group A(30%) than in group B(10%).The arterial was better pressured in group B than in group A.There were no severe side effects in the two groups.Conclusion Coadministration of propofol and small-dose ketamine can provide safe and effective anesthesia in patients undergoing loop electrosurgical excision procedure for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia,preserving stable hemodynamics,leaving less responsive body movements and requiring smaller dose of propofol.