Abstract:Safety evaluation is caught in a frustrating circle. It is neither possible nor sensible to try to obtain the information needed to assess every imaginable toxic risk associated with every substance, and pursuit of greater safety therefore demands the setting of priorities as well as sensible limits for investigation. To do this with confidence requires possessing the very information that is lacking and that can be won only slowly on a few substances at a time, with significant uncertainty and at considerable cost. This requires priorities, and completes the circle of frustration. Individual texicologists deal with this problem by using ‘experience’, a personal synthesis of accumulated knowledge of structure-activity relationships, metabolic mechanisms, chemical reactivity, human exposure and other relevant information. Such expert judgement is often very effective in distinguishing potential risks worth pursuing from problems on which effort would be wasted but, because it is usually so inexplicit and subjective, it is seldom able to invoke the public confidence most decisions now require.This paper proposes a procedure for making a significant part of this process rational, public and explicit. It uses much currently available toxicological data to validate the procedure, which consists of a ‘decision tree’ of 33 questions, each answered ‘yes’ or ‘no’. Each answer leads to another question or to final classification into one of three classes (I, II and III) reflecting a presumption of low, moderate or serious toxicity. The tree is organized into branches dealing with major chemical classifications and is intended for use with all ingested, structurally defined organic and metallo-organic substances. Answering the questions requires chemical or biochemical training, and relies primarily on features of chemical structure. Occurrence in body tissues and fluids, and natural occurrence in food are also involved. The logic of the tree rests heavily on known data on metabolism and toxicity. The classification according to presumptive toxicity can be combined with knowledge of human intake to provide for each substance a ‘protection index’, which can be used to establish priorities and to define tentatively the extent of appropriate testing. The procedure has been applied to a large number of pesticides, drugs, food additives and industrial and environmental chemicals of known biological properties. So far it has not resulted in any underestimation of toxicity, and it appears to provide a practical means for discriminating effectively among different levels of probable hazard.

[Use of Threshold of Toxicological Concern for Chemical Substances Safety Assessment].

An interim internal Threshold of Toxicologic Concern (iTTC) for chemicals in consumer products, with support from an automated assessment of ToxCast™ dose response data

Exposure based waiving: the application of the toxicological threshold of concern (TTC) to inhalation exposure for aerosol ingredients in consumer products

Computational Toxicology and Its Application in Toxicity Study of Traditional Chinese Medicine

The TTC Data Mart: An interactive browser for threshold of toxicological concern calculations

Different Decreasing Rates of Chemical Threshold Concentrations Can Be Explained by Their Toxicokinetic and Toxicodynamic Characteristics

Safety assessment of non-intentionally added substance migrated from food contact material

Bioconcentration, Metabolism and Alterations of Thyroid Hormones of Tris(1,3-dichloro-2-propyl) Phosphate (TDCPP) in Zebrafish

Pathway-based Assessment of Single Chemicals and Mixtures by a High-Throughput Transcriptomics Approach

Development of Toxicity Index to Evaluate the Level of Water Contamination by Using Cellular Responses

Current risk assessment approaches in different countries

Refined Cumulative Risk Assessment of Pb, Cd, and as in TCM Decoction Based on Bioavailability through In Vitro Digestion/MDCK Cells

The toxicity and health risk of chlorothalonil to non-target animals and humans: A systematic review

Water Quality Criteria Derivation and Ecological Risk Assessment for Triphenyltin in China.

Priority screening of contaminants of emerging concern in drinking water sources of eastern China: Assessing risks based on exposure-activity ratios (EARs)

Differential effects of thiamethoxam and clothianidin exposure on their tissue distribution and chronic toxicity in mice

Estimation of toxic hazard—A decision tree approach

Dioxins: WHO's tolerable daily intake (TDI) revisited

MRTCM: A Comprehensive Dataset for Probabilistic Risk Assessment of Metals and Metalloids in Traditional Chinese Medicine

Toxic Assessment of Triclosan and Triclocarban on

Advances In Tce Toxicology