Abstract:Safety evaluation is caught in a frustrating circle. It is neither possible nor sensible to try to obtain the information needed to assess every imaginable toxic risk associated with every substance, and pursuit of greater safety therefore demands the setting of priorities as well as sensible limits for investigation. To do this with confidence requires possessing the very information that is lacking and that can be won only slowly on a few substances at a time, with significant uncertainty and at considerable cost. This requires priorities, and completes the circle of frustration. Individual texicologists deal with this problem by using ‘experience’, a personal synthesis of accumulated knowledge of structure-activity relationships, metabolic mechanisms, chemical reactivity, human exposure and other relevant information. Such expert judgement is often very effective in distinguishing potential risks worth pursuing from problems on which effort would be wasted but, because it is usually so inexplicit and subjective, it is seldom able to invoke the public confidence most decisions now require.This paper proposes a procedure for making a significant part of this process rational, public and explicit. It uses much currently available toxicological data to validate the procedure, which consists of a ‘decision tree’ of 33 questions, each answered ‘yes’ or ‘no’. Each answer leads to another question or to final classification into one of three classes (I, II and III) reflecting a presumption of low, moderate or serious toxicity. The tree is organized into branches dealing with major chemical classifications and is intended for use with all ingested, structurally defined organic and metallo-organic substances. Answering the questions requires chemical or biochemical training, and relies primarily on features of chemical structure. Occurrence in body tissues and fluids, and natural occurrence in food are also involved. The logic of the tree rests heavily on known data on metabolism and toxicity. The classification according to presumptive toxicity can be combined with knowledge of human intake to provide for each substance a ‘protection index’, which can be used to establish priorities and to define tentatively the extent of appropriate testing. The procedure has been applied to a large number of pesticides, drugs, food additives and industrial and environmental chemicals of known biological properties. So far it has not resulted in any underestimation of toxicity, and it appears to provide a practical means for discriminating effectively among different levels of probable hazard.

Estimation of toxic hazard—A decision tree approach

Metabolism-based category formation for the prioritisation of genotoxicity hazard assessment for plant protection product residues (Part 4): α-Chloroacetamides

An automated computational data pipeline to rapidly acquire, score, and rank toxicological data for ecological hazard assessment

Prioritizing Chemicals for Risk Assessment Using Chemoinformatics: Examples from the IARC Monographs on Pesticides

A comparative evaluation of five hazard screening tools

Toxicity prediction using target, interactome, and pathway profiles as descriptors

Predicting Organ Toxicity Using in Vitro Bioactivity Data and Chemical Structure.

The TTC Data Mart: An interactive browser for threshold of toxicological concern calculations

A UK scheme to help small firms control health risks from chemicals: toxicological considerations

Preliminary study on classification of toxic work

Predicted no effect concentration derivation as a significant source of variability in environmental hazard assessments of chemicals in aquatic systems: An international analysis

Predicting Organ Toxicity Using &Itin Vitro&It Bioactivity Data And Chemical Structure

A quantitative screening-level approach to incorporate chemical exposure and risk into alternative assessment evaluations

Diagnosis of complex mixture toxicity in sediments: Application of toxicity identification evaluation (TIE) and effect-directed analysis (EDA)

A toxicity pathway-oriented approach to develop adverse outcome pathway: AHR activation as a case study

Novel Integrated Tiered Cumulative Risk Assessment of Heavy Metals in Food Homologous Traditional Chinese Medicine Based on a Real-Life-Exposure Scenario

Pathway-based Assessment of Single Chemicals and Mixtures by a High-Throughput Transcriptomics Approach

Explainable AI and tree-based ensemble models: a comparative study in predicting chemical pulmonary toxicity

Hexabromocyclododecane (HBCD): A case study applying tiered testing for human health risk assessment

Classification of Chemicals Based on Concentration-Dependent Toxicological Data Using ToxClust

Intuitive toxicology in the 21st century—Bridging the perspectives of the public and risk assessors in Europe