Discussion on"Indirect Infringement":taking"Baidu & Yahoo"cases as the beginning

杨明
2009-01-01
Abstract:Following the cases of"Baidu"and"Yahoo",more and more scholars care about how to ascertain the IP infringement done by ISP and the problem about liabilities.But most of them are interested in leading the system of"Indirect Infringement"into China which is coming from American Law.Maybe,it doesn't touch the key point.Where does the concept of"Indirect Infringement"come from? If this concept should be accepted,what is the relationship between"Indirect Infringer"and"Direct Infringer"when they should take on the liabilities for compensation.And,what is the relationship between"Indirect Infringement"and"Joint Infringement"which has been built in the legal system of our country. So,the problem is not how to build the system of"Indirect Infringement"first,but to discriminate the concept of"Indirect Infringement"itself.Then,we can make sure whether it is should be lead into.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?