Abstract:The purpose of this study is to investigate the rela-tionships between firm resources and performance. We divide firm resources into two types: primary resources and sup-port resources. Primary resources include technological as-sets and configuration capabilities,which directly contribute to a firm’s competitive advantage. Support resources include internal human capital,inter-firm collaboration,and manage-rial vision,which contribute to the development of primary resources. Using a sample of 548 new ventures in China,our analysis revealed that both technological assets and configura-tion capabilities significantly enhanced firm performance that the firms with superior technological assets tended to posses superior configuration capabilities,and that most of the sup-port resources significantly contributed to the development of both technological assets and configuration capabilities,spe-cifically,both internal human capital and inter-firm collabora-tion greatly improved firms’ technological assets; both inter-firm collaboration and managerial vision have heavy impact on firms’ configuration capabilities. The present study makes several contributions to the resource-based view of the firm (RBV) literature. First,we conceptually distinguished between technological assets and configuration capabilities and empiri-cally examined their impact on performance,which clearly suggest that the "using" decision was even more important than the "owing" decision. Secondly,we examined the systematic relationships between primary and support resources,which suggest that primary and support resources work dynamically in a complementary manner to develop a firm’s competitive advantage. Thirdly,we empirically addressed all the relation-ships in a large sample of Chinese new ventures. Practically,the present study has two implications for managers. First,the evidence suggests that the impact of configuration capabilities on performance is even greater than that of technological assets although both have substantial positive performance effects. Secondly,the evidence suggests that inter-firm collaboration is a very effective means of developing configuration capabilities and is substantially superior to internal development.

Comparative Analysis on Resource Management Process between New Ventures and Mature Firms

An empirical analysis on evolutionary path of nongovernmental enterprises' resources

Measurement of new ventures'resource development process

The Relationship Between Resource Acquisition Methods and Firm Performance in Chinese New Ventures: the Intermediate Effect of Learning Capability**

The Resource Allocation Efficiency in the Internal Capital Market

Research on Maturity Model of Enterprise NPD Project Management

The Relationship Between Resources and Capabilities of New Ventures in Emerging Economies

Performance Impact of Technological Assets and Configuration Capabilities:An Empirical Research of Chinese New Ventures

Comparative Research on Management Environment in State-Owned Enterprises and Joint-Ventures

Empirical Analysis on Relationship among Network Competence, Resource Acquisition and New Firm Performance

Driving New Venture Sustainability: A Study Based on Configuration Theory and Resource Orchestration Theory

Resource Combination Process Model during New Venture Creation

A Review on Resource Allocation Process Study

Characteristic of China-based International New Ventures and Comparative Analysis with Domestic New Ventures

Study on the Patterns of R&D Project Management and their Benchmarking

Environment, Resource Integration, and New Ventures’ Competitive Advantage in China

An Empirical Research On The Evolution Model Of Competitiveness Between Different Life Cycle Stages In Chinese Enterprises

Comparison of Enterprise's Knowledge Management Maturity Models : Based on Processes , Levels and Characteristics

Reseach on the Differences of Key Factors and Functional Mechanism Between First-venture and Second-venture:Match among Opportunities, Resources and Capacities

Resource or Strategy——Evidence from Privately-hold Firms in China

Comparison of Enterprise's Knowledge Management Maturity Models