Abstract:Ecological compensation has been adopted in many countries and proved a good approach to protect environment.The focus of ecological compensation study was how to set ecological compensation standard.The ecological compensation standard was assessed mainly based on the methods of market value approach,opportunity cost approach,willingness to pay approach and cost analysis approach.Thus,the ecological footprint(EF) was applied rarely.The EF was defined as the biologically productive land and water a population requires to produce the resources it consumes and to absorb part of the waste generated by fossil and nuclear fuel consumption.The EF provides an aggregate estimate of demands upon the biophysical productivity and waste assimilation capacity of nature imposed by human lifestyles.This aggregate indicator permits the estimation of the equivalent land/sea area,or biosphere,required to support productive activities.Its unique attribute is that it accounts for the demand upon natural resources,in terms of an equivalent land/sea area,or global hectares.The EF method has been proposed as a standard methodology to evaluate the environmental implications of alternative development models.The EF analysis becomes widely adopted as a key environmental indicator of sustainable development. River ecosystem services imply the natural environmental conditions and their effectiveness formed and sustained by river ecosystem and its ecological processes,on which,human life relies of existence.Ecological supply footprint was defined as the enhanced river ecological services′ supply ability caused by the project construction.The enhanced ability was converted to the total biologically productive land/water area.Ecological demand footprint was defined as the weakened river ecological services′ supply ability caused by the project construction.The weakened ability was converted to the total biologically productive land/water area.Five value models(ecological supply footprint models of flooding control,hydropower,reservoir irrigation,improve waterway and reservoir breeding.) of ecological compensation subject and eight loss models(ecological demand footprint models of reservoir sedimentation,reservoir inundation,construction of resettlement area,soil and water erosion,river ecosystem occupied by project,energy consumption of project construction,sewage discharge of project construction,and produce cement and steel.) of ecological compensation object were established based on the idea of ecological footprint on Zaoshi Water Conservancy Project(ZWCP).And the ecological compensation standard of ZWCP was evaluated by the models.The results show that: ① Five ecological supply footprints were 88482.2974 hm2/a in total,which was converted to 6.2353×108Yuan RMB annually.Eight ecological demand footprints were 14946.4861 hm2/a in total,which was converted to 1.0533×108Yuan RMB annually.The values were the losses′ 5.92 times.② Three schemes of ecological compensation standard were proposed,on the premise of identifying the ecological compensation subject and the ecological compensation object.The second scheme was recommended.③ The second scheme of Ecological compensation standard on ZWCP was 0.5238×108 Yuan RMB annually.The central-local government and hydropower development owner were the main ecological compensation subjects,which undertook 52.50% and 35.77% of ecological compensation standard respectively.The resettlements and the river ecosystem were the main ecological compensation object,which obtained 72.16% and 15.68% of ecological compensation standard respectively.

Cross-regional Land Ecological Compensation——An Example of the Experimental Areas of Resource Saving and Environmental Friendly Society

Multiobjective Optimization for Eco-Compensation Space Selection based on Gross Ecosystem Product

Identifying Cross-Regional Ecological Compensation Based on Ecosystem Service Supply, Demand, and Flow for Landscape Management

A Study of Ecological Compensation from the Perspective of Regional Division

The Study on Eco-Compensation in Restricted Development Zones under the Framework of the Main Functional Area

A study on ecological compensation standard for Zaoshi Water Conservancy Project based on the idea of ecological footprint

Fairness analysis and compensation strategy in the Triangle of Central China driven by water-carbon-ecological footprints

Using Ecosystem Service Flows to Inform Ecological Compensation: Theory & Application

Major Problems and Countermeasures for the Establishment of Ecological Compensation Systems for National Key Ecological Function Areas

Ecological Compensation For Large Water Projects Based On Ecological Footprint Theory: A Case Study In China

Gains or losses? A quantitative estimation of environmental and economic effects of an ecological compensation policy

Quantitative analysis of ecological compensation in the Yangtze River Delta region based on the value of ecosystem services and ecological footprint

A study on the quantification and impact mechanism of regional ecological compensation based on revised carbon accounts: evidence from the Yellow River Basin economic zone in China

Advances in theory and methodology of ecological compensation

Based on ecological footprint and ecosystem service value, research on ecological compensation in Anhui Province, China

Cross-regional ecological compensation under the composite index of water quality and quantity: A case study of the Yellow River Basin

A framework for eco-compensation in the Yangtze River Delta region of China based on multiple policy objectives

Accounting of Ecological Compensation Standards of Main Function Zones

Estimation of the Rational Range of Ecological Compensation to Address Land Degradation in the Poverty Belt around Beijing and Tianjin, China

Designing cross-region ecological compensation scheme by integrating habitat maintenance services production and consumption—A case study of Jing-Jin-Ji region

Farmland Ecological Compensation Zoning and Horizontal Fiscal Payment Mechanism in Wuhan Agglomeration, China, From the Perspective of Ecological Footprint