Abstract:At the end of the 1990s China started to construct an ecological compensation system for national key ecological function areas. An eco-compensation system focusing on the Transfer Payment of National Key Ecological Function Areas has been established. The current eco-compensation system has played a positive role in improving the ecological environment of national key ecological function areas; but the ecological effect is weakening due to existing problems in the eco-compensation system such as unreasonable calculation of compensation standards, poor expression of rights and interests of stakeholders, simple sources of capital and modes of compensation. For better development, the eco-compensation system should be improved by (i) adhering to the combination of vertical compensation (oriented) and horizontal compensation (auxiliary) on the whole and establishing a transfer payment system of eco-compensation at national scale; (ii) defining the compensation standard according to ecological protection costs, development opportunity costs and ecological service values and adding indicators that reflect economic green transformation to evaluate compensation effects; (iii) gradually building a utilization system of eco-compensation funds in which multi-stakeholders participate and establishing a green development-oriented system to evaluate the performance of local governments; and (iv) cultivating a new business pattern where ecological services are the product, to grow the ecological service industry.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
This paper mainly discusses the main problems in the construction of the ecological compensation system in China's national key ecological function areas and the corresponding countermeasures and suggestions. Specifically, the paper points out:
1. **Problems**:
- **Unreasonable compensation standard calculation method**: The current ecological compensation standards are mainly calculated based on the fiscal revenue and expenditure gap, failing to fully reflect the ecological protection cost, the development opportunity cost and the ecological service value.
- **The rights and interests of stakeholders are not fully reflected**: In the process of fund allocation and use, the voice of local governments is strong, while the rights, interests and opinions of stakeholders such as enterprises and farmers are not effectively expressed.
- **Single source channels of compensation funds and compensation methods**: It mainly depends on central financial support, with fewer investment channels for local finance, enterprises, non - governmental organizations and individuals, and the compensation methods are relatively single, lacking a horizontal compensation mechanism.
2. **Countermeasures and suggestions**:
- **Adhere to the overall idea of taking vertical compensation as the main, horizontal compensation as the auxiliary, and combining vertical and horizontal**: It is recommended to establish an ecological compensation transfer payment at the national level, integrate the existing forest ecological benefit compensation funds, grassland ecological protection incentive subsidies and other funds, and form a unified vertical ecological compensation system.
- **Take ecological protection cost, development opportunity cost and ecological service value as the basis for determining compensation standards**: In the evaluation of compensation effects, add indicators reflecting the degree of economic greening, such as the proportion of ecological industries, energy consumption per unit of GDP, etc.
- **Gradually establish a compensation fund use mechanism with multi - stakeholder participation**: In the process of fund allocation decision - making and specific use, gradually establish a participation mechanism for multi - stakeholders (including farmers, herdsmen and related enterprises), and disclose relevant information to the public.
- **Actively cultivate emerging business forms with ecological services as products**: Promote the development of the ecological service industry, and promote the prosperity of the ecological service industry by establishing an ecological product certification system and developing new ecological service product industries.
Through these measures, the paper aims to provide references for the formulation of relevant policies, further improve the ecological compensation system in national key ecological function areas, so as to better protect and restore the ecological environment and achieve green and sustainable development.