Abstract:This paper adopts minutely high-frequency data of yields,volumes and open interests of the six commodities futures in three exchanges of China to probe into their intraday change patterns,and discovers the `L' pattern intraday movement of absolute yield and volume.We exert financial market microstructure theory,traders' psychology and trading mechanism to explain the different intraday phenomenon between the futures market and the stock market,which has a distinctive `U' pattern.Basing on this,by the help of Granger causality test theories and Vector Autoregressive models(VAR),we study the factors that influence the volatility of yields and the lagged orders.The results show that there are two-way Granger causality among each two of the absolute yield,volume and open interest, which is different from the empirical result of the stock market that there is a one-way Granger causality from volume to absolute yield,and the difference comes from the short mechanism of futures market.Through the decomposition of variance of VAR models and the impulse response analysis,we empirically analyze the dynamic relationship among the three factors.The conclusion shows that: when we treat the volatility of absolute yield as an explained variable,the residual disturbance can be explained about 90% by its lagged terms,and volume can explain about 10%.When volume is interpreted as an explained variable,about 80% of the residual disturbance can be explained by its lagged terms and the volatility of the absolute price explains about 20%.When open interest is considered as an explained variable,lagged terms of its own interprets about 45% to 70% of the residual disturbance,the volume explains 25%-45%,and the volatility of absolute price explains 5% to 10%.All the explanatory variables reach stable about 20-30 minutes later.Empirical result tells the weak impact from open interest to volatility of absolute yield and volume and the strong correlation between volatility of absolute yield and volume.Some investment suggestions are offered from the analysis mentioned above.

Daily Return Volatility, Bid-Ask Spreads, and Information Flow: Analyzing the Information Content of Volume

Stochastic Volatility, Liquidity and Intraday Information Flow

Spillover Effects and Dynamic Correlations Between Spot and Forward Tanker Freight Markets

Research on the Relations of the Information Flow, Return Volatility and Trade Volume in Chinese Stock Market

Marketwide Private Information and Market Volatility-Volume Relation

The relationship between volatility and trading volume in the Chinese stock market: A volatility decomposition perspective

Predicting Volatility and the Information Content of Informed Traders in an Option Market

Information Production, Volume, and Return Dynamics

Intraday Effects Analysis of Chinese Futures Markets

An empirical analysis of the dynamic relationship between mutual fund flow and market return volatility☆

Determinants and Information Content of Intraday Bid-Ask Spreads: Evidence from Chinese Commodity Futures Markets

The asymmetric relationships between the Bitcoin futures' return, volatility, and trading volume

Volatility of Chinese futures market based on ACD model

Predicting market instability: New dynamics between volume and volatility

Investigation in Relation between Volatility and Trade Volume of China's Stock Market

The volume-implied volatility relation in financial markets: A behavioral explanation

When Noise Trading Fades, Volatility Rises

Dynamics of Bid-ask Spread Return and Volatility of the Chinese Stock Market

The Quantile Analysis of the Relationship Between Trading Volume, Return and Volatility in Futures Market

The Investigation on the Relation between Behavior of Traders and Volatility Based on the Information Asymmetric Model——Trade Size and Trade Numbers

Degree of Irrationality: Sentiment and Implied Volatility Surface