The management of ureteropelvic junction obstruction by retroperitoneal laparoscopic nondismembered pyeloplasty
XU Kai,ZHANG Xu,LI Dadeng,ZHANG Jun,FU Bin,LANG Bin,AI Xing,SHI Taoping
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1001-1420.2006.11.011
2006-01-01
Journal of Clinical Urology
Abstract:Objective:To elucidate the clinical curative effects and feasibilities of the management of ureteropelvic junction obstruction by retroperitoneal laparoscopic nondismembered pyeloplasty.Methods:The clinical data of 36 cases of patients with UPJO were collected from 2002 to 2005. As nondismembered pyeloplasties, Foley Y-V pyeloplasty, Fenger pyeloplasy and Hellstrm technique were resorted base on the judgements and filtrations during the operations. Follow-up studies included IVP, renal ultrasound and renal function examination after 4 to-6 weeks postoperatively when the double J tube was removed, and every 3 months thereafter range from 12 to 36 months (average 28 months). Success was considered as amelioration of the symptoms such as pain, infection and so on, and IVP (less hydronephrosis, visible UPJ and normal drainage), and improvement of renal function confirmed by renal function examination.Results:There was no conversion to open surgery. Among 17 Foley Y-V pyeloplasty receptors, there were 2 cases had recurrence during average 20 months after extraction of double J tube, and open dismembered pyeloplasy solved them thereafter. Among 11 Fenger pyeloplasty receptors, there was 1 case had recurrence during average 22 months follow up, and sacculus vestibularis dilation was resorted to treat it. The reasons of recurrences of these two nondismembered pyeloplasties should to be the reservation of anomaly stenosis, and the ureter peristalsis was interfered by these procedures, this could be the main reason of recurrence. Among 8 Hellstrm technique receptors, the obstructions were resolved or significantly improved, and no complications such as urine leakage and infections were found during average 13.6 months follow up. The long term follow-up should be imperative.Conclusions:Because the anomaly stenosis was reserved in some nondismembered pyeloplasties, this could be the main reason of recurrence after operations. So the dismembered pyeloplasty should to be first considered if the conditions are suitable. Meanwhile, some special cases of UPJO associated with crossing vessel seem to be suitable to retroperitoneal laparoscopic Hellstrm technique.