Abstract:BiopolymersVolume 45, Issue 1 p. 35-49 Folding type-specific secondary structure propensities of amino acids, derived from α-helical, β-sheet, α/β, and α+β proteins of known structures Bo Jiang, Corresponding Author Bo Jiang Department of Biological, Sciences, and Biotechnology, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, P.R. ChinaSchool of Economics, Peking University, 100871, P.R. ChinaSearch for more papers by this authorTao Guo, Tao Guo Department of Biological, Sciences, and Biotechnology, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, P.R. ChinaSearch for more papers by this authorLei-Wei Peng, Lei-Wei Peng Department of Biological, Sciences, and Biotechnology, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, P.R. ChinaSearch for more papers by this authorZhi-Rong Sun, Zhi-Rong Sun Department of Biological, Sciences, and Biotechnology, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, P.R. ChinaSearch for more papers by this author Bo Jiang, Corresponding Author Bo Jiang Department of Biological, Sciences, and Biotechnology, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, P.R. ChinaSchool of Economics, Peking University, 100871, P.R. ChinaSearch for more papers by this authorTao Guo, Tao Guo Department of Biological, Sciences, and Biotechnology, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, P.R. ChinaSearch for more papers by this authorLei-Wei Peng, Lei-Wei Peng Department of Biological, Sciences, and Biotechnology, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, P.R. ChinaSearch for more papers by this authorZhi-Rong Sun, Zhi-Rong Sun Department of Biological, Sciences, and Biotechnology, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, P.R. ChinaSearch for more papers by this author First published: 06 December 1998 https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0282(199801)45:1<35::AID-BIP4>3.0.CO;2-%23Citations: 16AboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditWechat Abstract Folding type-specific secondary structure propensities of 20 naturally occurring amino acids have been derived from α-helical, β-sheet, α/β, and α+β proteins of known structures. These data show that each residue type of amino acids has intrinsic propensities in different regions of secondary structures for different folding types of proteins. Each of the folding types shows markedly different rank ordering, indicating folding type-specific effects on the secondary structure propensities of amino acids. Rigorous statistical tests have been made to validate the folding type-specific effects. It should be noted that α and β proteins have relatively small α-helices and β-strands forming propensities respectively compared with those of α+β and α/β proteins. This may suggest that, with more complex architectures than α and β proteins, α+β and α/β proteins require larger propensities to distinguish from interacting α-helices and β-strands. Our finding of folding type-specific secondary structure propensities suggests that sequence space accessible to each folding type may have differing features. Differing sequence space features might be constrained by topological requirement for each of the folding types. Almost all strong β-sheet forming residues are hydrophobic in character regardless of folding types, thus suggesting the hydrophobicities of side chains as a key determinant of β-sheet structures. In contrast, conformational entropy of side chains is a major determinant of the helical propensities of amino acids, although other interactions such as hydrophobicities and charged interactions cannot be neglected. These results will be helpful to protein design, class-based secondary structure prediction, and protein folding. © 1998 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Biopoly 45: 35–49, 1998 Citing Literature Volume45, Issue1January 1998Pages 35-49 RelatedInformation

The Role of Secondary Structure in Protein Structure Selection

Effect of Secondary Structure on the Conformations and Folding Behaviors of Protein-Like Chains

Emergence Of Preferred Structures In A Simple Model Of Protein Folding

Properties and Origins of Protein Secondary Structure

Secondary-structure-favored Hydrophobic-Polar Lattice Model of Protein Folding.

Statistical analysis of the unique characteristics of secondary structures in proteins

Prediction of protein folding rates from simplified secondary structure alphabet

The role of evolutionary selection in the dynamics of protein structure evolution

Folding type-specific secondary structure propensities of amino acids, derived from alpha-helical, beta-sheet, alpha/beta, and alpha+beta proteins of known structures

Medium Effects on the Selection of Sequences Folding into Stable Proteins in a Simple Model.

Are Protein Folds Atypical?

Secondary Structure Length As a Determinant of Folding Rate of Proteins with Two‐ and Three‐state Kinetics

Specific Interactions for Ab Initio Folding of Protein Terminal Regions with Secondary Structures

Why Do Proteins Look Like Proteins?

Folding Type‐specific Secondary Structure Propensities of Amino Acids, Derived from Α‐helical, Β‐sheet, Α/β, and Α+β Proteins of Known Structures

The Protein Folding Mechanism Revealed by the Folding Free Energy Landscape Analysis and Denaturation Simulations

Designability and Thermal Stability of Protein Structures

Secondary structure determines protein topology.

Inaccurate secondary structure predictions often indicate protein fold switching

Effect factors on secondary structure of protein sequence pattern

The role of hydrophobic interactions in folding of $β$-sheets