Feasibility of real-time pelvic sphincterial electromyographic monitoring during laparoscopic radical prostatectomy

SITU Jie,WEN Xing-qiao,ZHANG Hao,HU Cheng,GAO Xin
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3253.2012.03.002
2012-01-01
Abstract:Objective To evaluate whether real-time pelvic sphincterial electromyographic(PSE) monitoring during laparoscopic radical prostatectomy contributes to postoperative continence recovery.Methods Eighty patients with stage T2a-T3a prostate cancer(PC) were enrolled.All patients had preoperative full continence and were randomly divided into two groups(n=40 per group).Patients in the PSE group underwent real-time PSE monitoring during laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and those in control group received laparoscopic radical prostatectomy alone.NIM-Response 1.0 electromyographic monitor system(Medtronic ENT Medtronic USA,Inc.) was used for the dissection,explosion and protection of the periprostatic nerve during the surgery.Follow up was done at outpatient clinic or by telephone to evaluate the urinary continence status on the day of catheter removal,3rd month and 6th month postoperatively.Cystourethroscopy and urodynamic examination were performed on the 30th day after surgery.Results Surgery was successfully performed in all patients.There were no significant differences between two groups in baseline variables(P>0.05).In the PSE group,PSE showed the innervation of urethral sphincter was like a network,and thus continence sparing techniques were used in the laparoscopy radical prostatectomy.Significant difference in full continence rate was found on the day of catheter removal(65.0% vs 37.5%,P<0.05,respectively),but absent on 3rd month and 6th month after surgery(80.0% vs 75.0% and 92.5% vs 90.0%).On the 30th day after surgery,urodynamic examination and cystourethroscopy demonstrated urethral closure and urethral sphincter,respectively,in both groups.Conclusion Our findings demonstrate that real-time PSE monitoring during laparoscopic radical prostatectomy is beneficial for the early continence recovery after radical prostatectomy.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?