Abstract:Suitable compatibilizers are essential to prepare immiscible polymer blends with stable co‐continuous morphologies. From the thermodynamic point of view, such compatibilizer should not only reduce the interfacial tension, but also promote the formation of flat interface between different phases. Meanwhile, it must not hinder the coalescence of dispersed phase. Therefore, asymmetric structures are required for those block or graft copolymer compatibilizers. However, from the kinetic point of view, copolymers with asymmetric structures are prone to be dragged out from the interface and form micelles in one phase under the processing conditions, which will lose their compatibilization effects. The balance between such thermodynamic and kinetic factors remains unclear. In this paper, the relationship between the morphology of the compatibilized polystyrene/nylon 6/styrene‐maleic anhydride copolymers (PS/PA6/SMA) immiscible polymer blends and the structures of the in‐situ formed SMA‐g‐PA6 graft copolymers as well as the processing conditions are studied. Two kinds of SMA are used as compatibilizers: SMA28 (Mw = 110,000 g/mol, MAH content 28 wt.%) and SMA11 (Mw = 110,000 g/mol, MAH content 11 wt.%). After melt blending with PA6 into an internal mixer, the in‐situ formed copolymer SMA28‐g‐PA6 has an average four PA6 side chains grafted on one SMA backbone, while that of SMA11‐g‐PA6 has only one PA6 side chain. Dissipative particle dynamics (DPD) simulation results indicate that both SMA28‐g‐PA6 copolymer and PS/PA6/SMA28 blends tend to form co‐continuous structure, while SMA11‐g‐PA6 copolymer and PS/PA6/SMA11 blends form sea‐island morphologies. However, these results are confirmed experimentally only at relatively low rotor speed of the internal mixer (60 rpm). When the rotor speed of the mixer is higher (105 rpm), sea‐island morphologies are obtained in PS/PA6/SMA28 blends and co‐continuous ones are found in PS/PA6/SMA11 systems. These results indicate that higher shear stress will favor to elongate the minor phase domains and form flat interfaces, which is benefit for the formation of co‐continuous morphologies; meanwhile, high shear stress may pull the graft copolymers with asymmetric structures (SMA28‐g‐PA6) out from the interface of PS and PA6 and induce the formation of sea island morphologies. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved

Phase-Separation In Polymer Blends Comprising Copolymers .5. Polyisoprene/Poly(Isoprene-G-Styrene) Copolymer System

Compatibilizing Efficiency of Copolymer Precursors for Immiscible Polymer Blends

Phase inversion during bulk copolymerization of N-phenylmaleimide/styrene in presence of polybutadiene (II): Effects of operation conditions and recipes on occurrence of phase inversion and structure of rubber phase

Phase Separation in Blends of Homopolymer and Graft Copolymer Based on Styrene and Butadiene

A Dissipative Particle Dynamics Study on the Compatibilizing Process of Immiscible Polymer Blends with Graft Copolymers

Phase-Separation In Polymer Blends Comprising Copolymers .6. Effect Of Molecular Architecture Of Block Copolymers

Phase Behavior of Ternary Homopolymer/Gradient Copolymer Blends

Studies on Phase-Separation in Polyblends of Block Copolymers

Phase-Separation In Polymer Blends Comprising Copolymers .7. Statistical-Theory Of Block Copolymer-Homopolymer Systems

Phase-Separation in Polymer Blends Comprising Copolymers .9. Statistical-Theory of Miscibility of Homopolymer in Spherical Domains of Block Copolymer

Influence of styrene-b-butadiene copolymer types on phase morphology and polymer partitioning between demixed-macrophases from HIPS-mimicking unstable blends

Phase Behavior and Phase Separation in Blends of a Liquid Crystalline Polymer and an Amorphous Polymer Containing Hydrogen-Bonding Interaction

Investigation on Phase Separation Kinetics of Polyolefin Blends Through Combination of Viscoelasticity and Morphology.

Phase Morphology of Immiscible Polymer Blends of Polystyrene with Poly(cis-butadiene) Rubber by Rayleigh Scattering

Study of Micro-Phase Separation of Two Polystyrene-Based Copolymer Mixture Using the Combination of PALS and FT-IR

Phase-Separation In Polymer Blends Comprising Copolymers .4. Polycarbonate Polystyrene Abcp System

Molecular Dynamics and Phase Behavior of Polystyrene/Poly(vinyl Methyl Ether) Blend in the Presence of Nanosilica

PHASE SEPARATION IN THE MELT OF POLYPROPYLENE–1-DECENE COPOLYMERS

PHASE-SEPARATION IN POLYMER BLENDS COMPRISING COPOLYMERS .8. STATISTICAL-THEORY OF BLOCK COPOLYMER HOMOPOLYMER SYSTEMS WITH SPHERICAL DOMAINS

Relationship Between The Co‐Continuous Morphology of Immiscible Polymer Blends and the Structure of An In Situ Formed Graft Copolymer

The study of poly(styrene-co-p-(hexafluoro-2-hydroxylisopropyl)-α-methyl-styrene)/poly(propylene carbonate) blends by ESR spin probe and Raman