Psychological Attribution and Policy Paths of Consumer's Low Carbon Consumption Behavior:An Exploratory Research Based On Grounded Theory

Wang Jianming,He Aizhong
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1008-3448.2011.04.010
2011-01-01
Abstract:Public consumption behavior patterns have important influence on the emissions of greenhouse gases such as carbon dioxide.The guidance of consumers' lifestyle and consumption behavior to the direction of low energy-consumption,low pollution,and low emission has become a major issue urgently to be solved.Why do consumers engage in low carbon consumption behavior(i.e.what's the internal motivations that could trigger consumers' low carbon consumption behavior)? How to guide them to engage in low carbon consumption behavior(i.e.how could consumers' low carbon con-sumption behavior be sustained)? In this context,this paper tries to explore socio-psychological attribution(which aims to solve the first problem above) and policy paths(which aims to solve the second problem above) of individual's low carbon consumption behavior through in-depth interviews,based on Grounded Theory.Which is different from previous studies,this study examines the socio-psychological attribution and policy paths simultaneously,and constructs an integrated framework.And we also explore the mechanism and dimension of each variable factor.Research finds that the two core factors(psychological consciousness,social reference criterion) are psychological and social attribution of consumers' low carbon con-sumption behavior.This affirms Bandura's Social Learning Theory.The mechanism of psychological consciousness and social reference criterion to generate low carbon consumption behavior are different,however.To be specifically,one's psychological consciousness could trigger his low carbon consumption behavior by Cognitive Learning effects,and social reference criterion induces low carbon consumption behavior by Social Learning effects.Individuals of different Locus of Control(e.g.internal locus of control or external locus of control) may differ in the generation mechanism.Communications & propagation(C&P) and institution & technology innovation(I&T) are the two main regulatory policies.What's more,the above two policies are interrelate and complement each other.To promote individual's psychological consciousness and social reference criterion by communications & propagation,and to change the individual's cost-benefit structure of low carbon consumption behavior by institution & technology innovation are the main intervention paths for the government.The results provide important implications for the government to transform consumer's consumption behavior patterns.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?