Abstract:Numerical studies of the interplanetary "shock overtaking magnetic cloud (MC)" event are continued by a 2.5 dimensional magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) model in heliospheric meridional plane. Interplanetary direct collision (DC)/oblique collision (OC) between an MC and a shock results from their same/different initial propagation orientations. For radially erupted MC and shock in solar corona, the orientations are only determined respectively by their heliographic locations. OC is investigated in contrast with the results in DC \citep{Xiong2006}. The shock front behaves as a smooth arc. The cannibalized part of MC is highly compressed by the shock front along its normal. As the shock propagates gradually into the preceding MC body, the most violent interaction is transferred sideways with an accompanying significant narrowing of the MC's angular width. The opposite deflections of MC body and shock aphelion in OC occur simultaneously through the process of the shock penetrating the MC. After the shock's passage, the MC is restored to its oblate morphology. With the decrease of MC-shock commencement interval, the shock front at 1 AU traverses MC body and is responsible for the same change trend of the latitude of the greatest geoeffectiveness of MC-shock compound. Regardless of shock orientation, shock penetration location regarding the maximum geoeffectiveness is right at MC core on the condition of very strong shock intensity. An appropriate angular difference between the initial eruption of an MC and an overtaking shock leads to the maximum deflection of the MC body. The larger the shock intensity is, the greater is the deflection angle. The interaction of MCs with other disturbances could be a cause of deflected propagation of interplanetary coronal mass ejection (ICME).

The Effect of the Heliospheric Current Sheet on Interplanetary Shocks

Effects of background solar wind and drag force on the propagation of coronal mass ejection driven shock

Solar Wind Parameters and Geomagnetic Indices for Four Different Interplanetary Shock/icme Structures

Effects of Background Solar Wind and Drag Force on the Propagation of Coronal-mass-ejection-driven Shocks

Quantifying the Propagation of Fast Coronal Mass Ejections from the Sun to Interplanetary Space Combining Remote Sensing and Multi-Point in-situ Observations

Why the Shock-ICME Complex Structure is Important: Learning from the Early 2017 September CMEs

Classification of Enhanced Geoeffectiveness Resulting from High-speed Solar Wind Streams Compressing Slower Interplanetary Coronal Mass Ejections

Multispacecraft Remote Sensing and In Situ Observations of the 2020 November 29 Coronal Mass Ejection and Associated Shock: From Solar Source to Heliospheric Impacts

Magnetohydrodynamic Simulation of the Interaction Between Interplanetary Strong Shock and Magnetic Cloud and Its Consequent Geoeffectiveness 2: Oblique Collision

Correction to “Interplanetary shock‐induced current sheet disturbances leading to auroral activations: THEMIS observations”

Propagation of Interplanetary Shocks in the Inner Heliosphere

Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics Statistical comparison of the ICME’s geoeffectiveness of different types and different solar phases from 1995 to 2014

A Comprehensive View of the 2006 December 13 CME: from the Sun to Interplanetary Space

The Intense Substorm Incidence in Response to Interplanetary Shock Impacts and Influence on Energetic Electron Fluxes at Geosynchronous Orbit

Observations of Impulsive Electric Fields Induced by Interplanetary Shock

Importance of Shock Compression in Enhancing ICME’s Geoeffectiveness

Full-Halo Coronal Mass Ejections: Arrival at the Earth

Multi-point Shock and Flux Rope Analysis of Multiple Interplanetary Coronal Mass Ejections Around 2010 August 1 in the Inner Heliosphere

3D Global Simulation of the Interaction of Interplanetary Shocks with the Magnetosphere

Statistical Analysis of Interplanetary Shocks from Mercury to Jupiter