Abstract:Aims. Our goal is to propagate multiple eruptions –obtained through numerical simulations performed in a previous study– to 1 AU and to analyse the effects of different background solar winds on their dynamics and structure at Earth. We also aim to improve the understanding of why some consecutive eruptions do not result in the expected geoeffectiveness, and how a secondary coronal mass ejection (CME) can affect the configuration of the preceding one. Methods. Using the 2.5D magnetohydrodynamics package of the code MPI-AMRVAC, we numerically modelled consecutive CMEs inserted in two different solar winds by imposing shearing motions onto the inner boundary, which in our case represents the low corona. In one of the simulations, the secondary CME was a stealth ejecta resulting from the reconfiguration of the coronal field. The initial magnetic configuration depicts a triple arcade structure shifted southward, and embedded into a bimodal solar wind. We triggered eruptions by imposing shearing motions along the southernmost polarity inversion line, and the computational mesh tracks them via a refinement method that applies to current-carrying structures, and is continuously adapted throughout the simulations. We also compared the signatures of some of our eruptions with those of a multiple CME event that occurred in September 2009 using data from spacecraft around Mercury and Earth. Furthermore, we computed and analysed the Dst index for all the simulations performed. Results. The observed event fits well at 1 AU with two of our simulations, one with a stealth CME and the other without. This highlights the difficulty of attempting to use in situ observations to distinguish whether or not the second eruption was stealthy, because of the processes the flux ropes undergo during their propagation in the interplanetary space. We simulate the CMEs propagated in two different solar winds, one slow and another faster one. In the first case, plasma blobs arise in the trail of eruptions. The faster solar wind simulations create no plasma blobs in the aftermath of the eruptions, and therefore we interpret them as possible indicators of the initial magnetic configuration, which changes along with the background wind. Interestingly, the Dst computation results in a reduced geoeffectiveness in the case of consecutive CMEs when the flux ropes arrive with a leading positive B z . When the B z component is reversed, the geoeffectiveness increases, meaning that the magnetic reconnections with the trailing blobs and eruptions strongly affect the impact of the arriving interplanetary CME.

Effects of Background Solar Wind and Drag Force on the Propagation of Coronal-mass-ejection-driven Shocks

Effects of background solar wind and drag force on the propagation of coronal mass ejection driven shock

Quantifying the Propagation of Fast Coronal Mass Ejections from the Sun to Interplanetary Space Combining Remote Sensing and Multi-Point in-situ Observations

The Effect of the Heliospheric Current Sheet on Interplanetary Shocks

Solar Wind Drag and the Kinematics of Interplanetary Coronal Mass Ejections

Influence of the ambient solar wind flow on the propagation behavior of interplanetary CMEs

Magnetohydrodynamic simulation of the 2012-July-12 CME Event With the Fluxrope-G3DMHD Model

Dynamics of solar Coronal Mass Ejections: forces that impact their propagation

Multispacecraft Remote Sensing and In Situ Observations of the 2020 November 29 Coronal Mass Ejection and Associated Shock: From Solar Source to Heliospheric Impacts

Geometry, Kinematics, and Heliospheric Impact of a Large CME-driven Shock in 2017 September

Effects of coronal mass ejection orientation on its propagation in the heliosphere

On Sun-to-Earth Propagation of Coronal Mass Ejections: 2. Slow Events and Comparison with Others

A Comprehensive View of the 2006 December 13 CME: from the Sun to Interplanetary Space

ON SUN-TO-EARTH PROPAGATION OF CORONAL MASS EJECTIONS: II. SLOW EVENTS AND COMPARISON WITH OTHERS

Evolution of the 12 July 2012 CME from the Sun to the Earth: Data‐constrained Three‐dimensional MHD Simulations

Three-Dimensional Mhd Simulation of Two Coronal Mass Ejections' Propagation and Interaction Using A Successive Magnetized Plasma Blobs Model

Study of the propagation, in situ signatures, and geoeffectiveness of shear-induced coronal mass ejections in different solar winds

Propagation Characteristics of Coronal Mass Ejections (cmes) in the Corona and Interplanetary Space

Sun-to-Earth Characteristics of the 2012 July 12 Coronal Mass Ejection and Associated Geo-effectiveness

Direct Observations of a Shock Traversing Preceding Two Coronal Mass Ejections: Insights from Solar Orbiter, Wind, and STEREO Observations

Strength of Coronal Mass Ejection-Driven Shocks Near the Sun and Their Importance in Predicting Solar Energetic Particle Events