Comparison of Different Anticoagulative Measures During Continue Blood Purification in the Patients with Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation

王锦权,刘宝,陶晓根,杨田军,赵劲松,张琳琳,秦玉荣,刘海华
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1671-7783.2009.05.013
2009-01-01
Abstract:Objective: To study the effect of different anticoagulative measures during continue blood purification(CBP) on the patients with disseminated intravascular coagulation(DIC) and analyze influencing factors on prognosis.Methods: Of prospective observational study,56 cases with DIC were treated with CBP(162 times).The death group and survival group were differentiated by 28-day mortality.According to anticoagulation,the patients were grouped as the low-dose unfractionated heprin(LDUFH),non-anticoagulation,regional heparin-protamine anticoagulation(RHPA) and regional citrate anticoagulation(RCA).The curative effect of different anticoagulation and impact factors on prognosis was observed. Results: Compared with the patients in survival group,APACHEⅡ score was higher(P0.01),hepatocholangeitis was more severity(P0.01),blood platelet count(BPC) was lower(P0.01) in death group.Furthermore,BPC was higher after CBP than that of pre-CBP in LDUFH group(P0.01).D-dimer was lower in LDUFH than that of non-anticoagulation group and RHPA group(P0.01).The duration of CBP was longer and complication was less in LDUFH. Conclusion: The patients with DIC were eligible to CBP on the premise of effective anticoagulation and rigorous monitoring.The anticoagulation of low-dose unfractionated heprin was of the first choice.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?