Abstract:Developing students' critical thinking skills in writing is essential in different educational contexts. However, the analysis of the argument structure in non-English-major undergraduate students' writing remains largely unexplored. This study aimed to analyze the structure of argumentative English papers written by Chinese university students, based on the adapted Toulmin model of argument structure constituting six elements (claim, data, counterargument claim, counterargument data, rebuttal claim, and rebuttal data). The participants in this study were a class of 47 sophomores enrolled in the course "Modern Education Technology" at Zhejiang University, China. They were required to identify the components of the argument structure in a pre-assigned short text with two opposing views, and to write an argumentative essay. Content analysis was used to assess the students' CT and argument structures. In both tasks, the results found that the majority of the students could identify author's claim with at least a piece of data. They also stated their own claims and provided at least one piece of data to back these up. However, a majority failed to identify the author's counter argument and even though many stated the counter argument claims in their essays, most were unjustified. The majority did not state a conclusion in both tasks. This study may be beneficial in understanding non-English major-undergraduate students' critical thinking skills in English writing and the results suggest that L2 essay writing instructors should use active and explicit methods such as computer-assisted argument mapping tools like RationaleTM to help learners master the argument structure. Some pedagogic guidelines are listed for the implementation of the RationaleTM software in the L2 classroom.

A Coh-Metrix-based model of linguistic features predicting argumentative writing quality of EFL learners

Analyzing Critical Thinking Elements in the Argument Structure of Non-English-Major Chinese Undergraduate Students' Writing

Coh-Metrix Model-Based Automatic Assessment of Interpreting Quality

How Syntactic Complexity Indices Predict Chinese L2 Writing Quality: an Analysis of Unified Dependency Syntactically-Annotated Corpus

Microfeatures influencing writing quality: the case of Chinese students’ SAT essays

The Analysis of Argument-Counterargument Structure in Chinese EFL Learners’ Argumentative Writing

To Predict L2 Writing Quality Using Lexical Richness Indices: an Investigation of Learners of Chinese As a Foreign Language

Genre Effect on L2 Syntactic Complexity and Holistic Rating for Writing Quality of Intermediate EFL Learners

Cohesive Features in Argumentative Writing Produced by Chinese Undergraduates

Quantitative Analysis of Academic Writing As to Informality and Vocabulary Features.

Linguistic Features Distinguishing Students' Writing Ability Aligned with CEFR Levels

Diagnosing Writing Ability Using China’s Standards of English Language Ability: Application of Cognitive Diagnosis Models

Syntactic Complexity in Assessing Young Adolescent EFL Learners’ Writings: Syntactic Elaboration and Diversity

Same Language, Different Functions: A Cross-Genre Analysis of Chinese EFL Learners’ Writing Performance

Unpacking the contribution of linguistic features to graph writing quality: An analytic scoring approach

Metacognitive writing strategies, critical thinking skills, and academic writing performance: A structural equation modeling approach

An Empirical Study of Devices for Lexical Cohesion in Chinese EFL Learners′ Written Discourse

References and Conjunctions As Cohesive Devices in Chinese Undergraduate EFL Students’ Argumentative Essays

Syntactic Complexity Development in the Writings of EFL Learners: Insights from a Dependency Syntactically-Annotated Corpus

The Development of Language Formality in Compositions of English Majors in China and Its Relationship with Writing Score

An empirical study of claims and qualifiers in ESL students’ argumentative writing based on Toulmin model