Abstract:Based on publications indexed in the Web of Science, the current study focused on internationally collaborated publications and publications acknowledging government funding of developing and developed countries including China, the US, Germany, the Netherlands, South Africa, and Brazil. Specific focus is placed on national funding agencies (i.e., focal agencies) supporting competitive research in science. The focal agencies of the six countries include the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC), the US National Science Foundation (NSF), German Research Foundation, the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO), National Research Foundation of South Africa (NRF), and National Council for Scientific and Technological Development of Brazil (CNPq). Results show that different countries vary in arrangement of government funding sources in support of competitive research projects. China and Brazil are centralized to the NSFC and CNPq, whereas the remaining four countries have relatively decentralized sources. The six focal national funding agencies of the current study are more efficient than non-focal agencies in raising citation impact, with the NWO, NSF, and NSFC perform better than non-focal agencies of corresponding countries. International collaboration improves citation impact, with the developing countries benefit more. Authorship (first or corresponding authorship) also plays a role in international collaboration. Collaboration led by authors from developed countries has a positive effect whereas that led by authors from developing countries usually have negative effects on citation impact. Interaction between funding and collaboration may have results different from those when these two factors are considered separately, which suggests being cautious while discussing effects of either of the two factors.

The Funding and Prospect of Global Brain Research

Human Brain Project And Neuroinformatics In China

China Brain Project: from Bench to Bedside.

Progress of the China Brain Project

Introduction and recent progress of BRAIN Initiative in the United States

Neuroinformatics research in china- current status and future research activities

A Scientometrics Analysis on Brain-Inspired Intelligence

Grand Research Plan for Neural Circuits of Emotion and Memory-Current Status of Neural Circuit Studies in China

An In-Depth Analysis of Government Funding and International Collaboration in Scientific Research

Brain Banks Spur New Frontiers in Neuropsychiatric Research and Strategies for Analysis and Validation

Toward Neuroinformatics of Neuroimaging Data Sharing and Open Brain Science

The Brain Research Hotspot Database (BRHD): A Panoramic Database of the Latest Hotspots in Brain Research

Cognitive neuroscience research in China: current status and proposals for future development

Brain bank in neurology history and development

Status and Trends of Neurosciences Research in China：Findings from Comparatine Analyses of Publications in the Past Decade

A Bibliometric Perspective on the Roles of Government Funding and International Collaboration in Scientific Research.

[Chinese Brain Template Built on 3D High Resolution MR Imaging at 3.0T].

Neuroscience output of China: A MEDLINE-based bibliometric study

Comparative Study on Output Performance of Major Public Funds in Terms of Chinese-language Publications

Standardized Operational Protocol for Human Brain Banking in China.

Neuroscience in China. Introduction.