A comparison between midline and paramedian approaches for intravertebral anesthesia in knee arthroscopy

韩文勇,李水清,李民,王军

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1009-6604.2007.06.023

2007-01-01

Abstract:Objective To investigate effects and complications of medline and paramedian approaches for intravertebral anesthesia in knee arthroscopy.Methods A total of 120 ASA I or II patients scheduled for knee arthroscopy were randomly assigned into 2 groups: either receiving midline approach intravertebral block(Medline Group) or paramedian approach block(Paramedian Group).A combined spinal-epidural anesthesia was performed with the single-segment needle-through-needle technique in both groups.The anesthetic response time,successful puncture rate,incidence of paresthesia,incidence of difficult epidural catheterization,incidence of traumatic needle placement,and backache rate and duration of both groups were observed respectively.Values of SBP,DBP,HR,and SpO2 at 1,5,10,30 minutes after anesthesia respectively were recorded.Results There were no significant differences(P<0.05) between the Medline Group and the Paramedian Group in the response time(5.2±0.4 min vs 5.1±0.6 min),the incidence of difficult epidural catheterization(1.7% vs 1.7%),the incidence of traumatic(evidence of blood) needle placement(3.4% vs 1.7%),and the incidence of paresthesia(3.4% vs 3.4%).No statistically significant differences were observed between the two groups in values of SBP,DBP,HR,and SpO2 at 1,5,10,30 minutes after anesthesia,respectively(P<0.05).However,as compared with the Medline Group,the Paramedian Group had significantly lower postoperative backache rate(23.3% vs 75.0%;χ2=32.042,P=0.000) and duration time(2.0±0.7 d vs 2.4±0.8 d;t=2.195,P=0.004). Conclusions Both paramedian and midline approaches can be safely utilized in knee arthroscopy.Paramedian approach offers lower postoperative incidence of backache than midline approach.