Abstract:Abstract It was not until China’s reform and opening-up that the study of Russian history in China really began. From the reform and opening-up to the present, the study of Russian history in China could be divided into two stages: from the reform and opening-up to the disintegration of the Soviet Union as the first stage; from the disintegration of the Soviet Union to the present is the second stage. During the first stage, Russian history researchers in China basically aimed to throw off shackles on their academic minds, set the chaotic academia straight, and break through the rigid research paradigm set by the History of the All-Union Communist Party (Bolsheviks): A Short Course . However, due to the lack of information exchange and new materials for reference, some articles published at that time appeared to be vague and general with very limited perceptions. Some articles completely broke the connection between Lenin era and Stalin era, and often judged Stalin by Lenin as a standard, and without taking Lenin and Stalin both as subjects for academic research. After the collapse of the Soviet Union, a large numbers of research results and new materials were published, which greatly promoted China’s Russian history studies into a new stage. Compared with the first stage before the disintegration of the Soviet Union, the second stage in Soviet history studies features more in-depth research and more specific research questions with basic innovation achieved in historical facts. China's study of Russian history in the future should focus on using new materials, sorting out historical facts and innovating research methodology, aiming to build an academic system, discourse system and discipline system for itself.

Debate Between Boris Porshnev and Roland Mousnier: Its Ins, Outs, and Revelations

Overseas Chinese Work-Study Students in France and Introduction of Marxist Thought on Education into China

The Attempts for the Ethicization of History by Neo-Marxism in Eastern Europe

The Historical Characteristics of French Contemporary Marxian Studies

On the Historic Destiny of Marxism Historiography in China

Marc Ferro and the French School of the History of International Relations

Soviet Sinology and Two Approaches to an Understanding of Chinese History

The Ideological Qutline of Representative Figures of the Annales School in France

Ancient Chinese economic thought and the French academic context of the 1930s: Li Zhaoyi’s doctoral thesis

Between Tradition and Revolution: Fan Wenlan and the Origins of the Marxist Historiography of Modern China

The New Ideal State of Tong Shuye's Historical Research

Russian Literature in France: A New Look at the History of Triumph

Debating the Cultural Revolution: Do We Only Know What We Believe?

Rethinking the Significance of the Russian and Chinese Revolutions: A Dialogue with Wang Hui

The Historical Logic of Russian Marxists' Understanding Capitalism and Its Modern Examination

The Tsinghua School and the Forefronts in the International Scholarship of History in the Early 20th Century

Developments in Russian Historical Studies in China since Reform and Opening-up

La Chine (vue De France), Une Inconnue ? Sur Les Contradictions, La Dialectique, La Morale Et Le Socialisme

Conqueror or Scholar——A View Different from Mr. Wang Weijiang's on Mr. Guo Moruo in the 1950S

“The Friendship of Our Two Peoples Never Ended”: Franco-Russian Cultural Contacts in the Late 19th Century — Middle 1930s

Discovering the Synthesis between Marxism and Xi Jinping’s thought on Socialism with Chinese Characteristics for a New Era