Synthesis and bioactivity of C-2 and C-3 methyl ether derivatives of brassinolide.

Thomas G Back,Loeke Janzen,Richard P Pharis,Zhaohua Yan
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0031-9422(02)00019-5
IF: 3.8
2002-01-01
Phytochemistry
Abstract:The following six novel methyl ether derivatives of brassinolide were prepared and their brassinosteroid activity was measured by means of the rice leaf lamina inclination bioassay: 2-O-methylbrassinolide, 3-O-methylbrassinolide, 2,22,23-tri-O-methylbrassinolide, 3,22,23-tri-O-methylbrassinolide, 2-O-methyl-25-methoxybrassinolide and 3-O-methyl-25-methoxybrassinolide. Brassinolide was used as a standard for comparison. All six compounds were also tested in the presence of 1000 ng of indole-3-acetic acid (IAA), an auxin that synergizes the effects of brassinosteroids. The 2-O-methyl- and 3-O-methylbrassinolide derivatives showed weak activity at high doses, which was enhanced by IAA, especially in the case of the 3-O-methyl derivative. Similarly, the 2,22,23-tri-O-methyl- and 3,22,23-tri-O-methyl derivatives displayed weak bioactivity on their own, but significantly stronger activity when applied with IAA. The 3-O-methyl and 3,22,23-tri-O-methyl analogues plus IAA were comparable in bioacivity to brassinolide alone, but were less active than brassinolide plus IAA. In each case, O-methylation at C-2 resulted in a greater loss of activity than O-methylation at C-3 under the same conditions. The relatively strong activity of 3,22,23-tri-O-methylbrassinolide in the presence of IAA is especially noteworthy as it indicates that free hydroxyl groups at C-3, C-22, and C-23 are not essential for bioactivity. Finally, 2-O-methyl- and 3-O-methyl-25-methoxybrassinolide were essentially inactive alone, and showed only a modest increase in bioactivity when coapplied with IAA.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?