Abstract:Due to the joint efforts made by the scholars of administrative law over the past two decades,theoretical frame on determination of administrative decision and revocation of rules has become more mature. The contents of this theoretical frame is that if any mistakes is found in an administrative act that has been established, the administrative organ should follow relevant rescinding rules rather than the principle of "collecting mistakes whenever discovered". However, according to administrative judgments and official replies and answers issued by the Supreme People’s Court, it is clear that the Supreme People’s Court insisted on the principle of "collecting mistakes whenever discovered" rather than was influenced by the theoretical frame mentioned earlier. The Court does not alter its view until the case of Jiao Zhigang was published as a guiding case on the Supreme People’s Court Gazette. According to the judgment of the case of Jiao Zhigang, once an administrative act has been legally made and come into force, the administrative act cannot be withdrawn at will, it is binding not only on the affected person(s), but also on the administrative organ itself. However, the relevant judgments made by the courts at various levels show that the case of Jiao Zhigang has not been frequently referred to in the judgments, and the principle of "collecting mistakes whenever discovered" is still deeply rooted. It is possibly because the guiding cases are lacking in practical value and statutory tradition. However, the rules made in the case of Jiao Zhigang are still valuable, and its value has not only represented the impact of the theory on the decisions by the courts, but also acted as a sign of the development of the idea of rule of law.

Judicial Review of Evident Injustice of Administrative Act

On "Refusal to Apply Rules" in Administrative Litigation:Based on the Analysis of No.5 Guiding Case Published by the Supreme People's Court

On Administrative Litigation's Performing Legal Duty Judgment

The Boundary of “Collecting Mistakes Whenever Discovered”

On Judicial Review of Abstract Administrative Act in China

Facts Judgment and Law Judgment in Administrative Litigation

On Examining Legality of Regulatory Documents in Administrative Litigation

Judicial Review on Abuse of Power by Administrative Authority

Judicial Review System of the abstract administrative Act and Its Improvement In China

Research on Judicial Review of Manifestly Improper Administrative Acts

The Standards and Methods of Judicial Review:From the Perspective of American Administrative Law

The Essential Constituents of a Lawful Administrative Action

On Judicial Governance of Administrative Discretion

The Present Situation of Abstract Administrative Action Supervision in Our country and the Construction of Judicial Review

On Form Natural Justice to Due Process——The Transplantation of Legal Thoughts on the Legistation of Administrative

Judicial Review of Administrative Interpretation in Specific Area:An Example from Worker's Compensation Administration

Procedural Sense and Legislative Perfection in Exercising the Court＇s Power in Evidence Investigations

The Judicial Application of "general Principles of Law" from the Perspective of European Administrative Law

Constitutional Interpretation and Value Evaluation Manners in Administrative Judgment

Citizens' Disregard of Illegal Administrative Acts

Study on China’s Judicial Review Mechanism of the Administrative Emergency Acts under Critical Situations