Nature and Art: on the Adequate Starting Point of Aesthetics of Nature

Xue Fuxing

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1003-1502.2013.02.013

2013-01-01

Abstract:Many of western aestheticians start with a comparison between the nature and art in their natural Aesthetics,by which they find out the unique aesthetic qualities of the nature and put a stress on the independence of aesthetic appreciation of the nature as well.However,they fail to realize that such a comparison can also invite an unexpected ramification,namely,a huge misleading to natural aesthetics: in the sense of history of aesthetic appreciation of the nature,it seems to be hard for us to image aesthetic appreciation of the nature before the birth of art;in logic,it's also impossible to build natural aesthetics without the help of art.Yet,literatures in Chinese ancient Aesthetics seem to support another hypothesis: the aesthetic appreciation of the nature is probably the earliest aesthetic practice.It can entirely survive without the aid from art.Aesthetic appreciation of the nature can not only be independent of art,but also provide necessary psychological foundation for art-making.It is not that aesthetic appreciation of the nature depends on art,but art depends on aesthetic appreciation of the nature.So,instead of the comparison between the nature and art,an adequate natural aesthetics ought to start with an independent and systematic investigation of the experience of aesthetic appreciation of the nature.