The Presence and the Absence in Chinese and Western Aesthetics

Peng Feng
2011-01-01
Abstract:In Chinese and Western aesthetics,there are different views about the presence and the absence in art.In Chinese aesthetics the absence is advocated while in Western aesthetics the presence is advocated.Though Plato and the Renaissance masters were totally different in their judgments for art,their criteria of judgment were almost the same.Plato depreciated art due to its absence,while the Renaissance masters appreciated art due to its presence.But in Chinese aesthetics art is appreciated due to its absence rather than its presence,and so it is different from both Plato and the Renaissance masters.In Chinese aesthetics,the appeal of art lies in its capacity for the spiritual transfiguration of the real or actual things instead of their representation.20th-century Western aestheticians have come to see the important role the absence plays in art,but their concept of the absence is quite different from that their Chinese counterparts hold.The former understands the absence as"an atmosphere of theory"which consists of systematic knowledge of art theory,history,and criticism;whereas the latter understands it as an internal self-understanding on which the ordinary life is hopefully transfigured into a work of art.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?