EFFECTS OF 2/100 HZ HAN'S ACUPOINT NERVE STIMULATOR ON OPIOID ADDICTS IN COMMUNITY-BASED REHABILITATION

Zhipeng QUAN,Mingxing QIN,Jisheng HAN,Liuzhen WU
DOI: https://doi.org/10.13936/j.cnki.cjdd1992.2010.03.010
2010-01-01
Abstract:Objective:To evaluate the effect of 2/100 Hz HANS on opioid addicts under community-based rehabilitation(CBR).Methods:One hundred and fifty-four opioid addicts under CBR were randomly divided into two groups to receive either transcutaneous acupoint electrical stimulation(HANS)or Mock-HANS for 12 months.Observation items included treatment retention rate,percentage of opioid-positive urine sample,protracted abstinence symptoms scores and opioid craving scores.Results:(1)At the end of 9th month,all patients in Mock-HANS group had dropped out,while 48.7% patients in HANS group kept in treatment;43.6% patients in HANS group persisted to the end of the 12 month study.HANS group had higher treatment retention rate than Mock-HANS group(P<0.001).(2)For total percentage of opioid-positive urine samples,Mock-HANS group and HANS group were 78.3% and 51.2%,respectively(P<0.001);for percentage of opioid-positive urine sample each month,except for 1st,3rd month,HANS group had lower percentage of opioid-positive urine samples than Mock-HANS group(P<0.05).(3)In Mock-HANS group,protracted abstinence symptom scores before and after treatment were 14.7±s 3.2 and 13.6±s 2.7,respectively,while in HANS group the scores decreased from 15.7±s 4.3 to 11.5±s 3.1.By statistics,there was significant difference between the two groups(P<0.001).(4) In Mock-HANS group,opioid craving scores before and after treatment were 39.1±s 12.6 and 37.8±s 10.4,respectively,while in HANS group the scores decreased from 38.1±s 10.2 to 28.5±s 7.3.There was also significant difference between the two groups(P<0.001).Conclusion:Patients received HANS treatment have higher treatment retention rate than those received Mock-HANS;transcutaneous acupoint electrical stimulation could relieve patients' protracted abstinence symptoms and opioid craving,and reduce their percentage of opioid-positive urine samples.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?