Abstract:Context: Much remains unanswered regarding how clinical reasoning is learned in the clinical environment. This study attempts to unravel how novice medical students learn to reason, by examining how they make sense of the clinical patient encounter. Method: The current study was part of a greater research project employing constructivist grounded theory (CGT) to develop a learning model of clinical reasoning. Introducing the sensemaking perspective, as a sensitising concept, we conducted a second level analytic phase with CGT, to further advance our previously developed model. This involved re-examining collected data from semi-structured interviews, participant observations and field interviews of novice students during their early clinical clerkships. Results: A learning model of how medical students make sense of the patient encounter emerged from the analysis. At its core lie three interdependent processes that co-constitute the students' clinical sensemaking activity. Framing the situation is the process whereby students discern salient situational elements, place them into a meaningful relationship and integrate them into a clinical problem. Inquiring into the situation is the process whereby students gain further insight into the situation by determining which questions need to be asked. Lastly, taking meaningful action is the process whereby students carve out a pathway of action, appropriate for the circumstances. Tensions experienced during these processes impair clinical sensemaking. Conclusions: The study provides an empirically informed learning model of clinical reasoning, during the early curricular stages. The model attempts to capture the complexity of medical practice, as students learn to recognise and respond to what constitutes the essence of a clinical situation. In this way, it contributes to a conceptual shift in how we think and talk about clinical reasoning. It introduces the concept of clinical sensemaking, as the act of carving a tangible clinical problem out of an often undetermined clinical situation and pursuing justified action.

Extending Sense-Making Models with Ideas from Cognition and Learning Theories.

Towards a Comprehensive Model of the Cognitive Process and Mechanisms of Individual Sensemaking

Process Patterns and Conceptual Changes in Knowledge Representations During Information Seeking and Sensemaking: A Qualitative User Study

Cognitive Mechanisms in Sensemaking: A Qualitative User Study

Supporting Sense-making with Tools for Structuring a Concept Space: A Proposal for Design and Evaluation

Iceberg Sensemaking: A Process Model for Critical Data Analysis and Visualization

Does It Make Sense? And Why? A Pilot Study For Sense Making And Explanation

How Emotional and Contextual Annotations Involve in Sensemaking Processes of Foreign Language Social Media Posts

Sensemaking and Scientific Modeling: Intertwined processes analyzed in the context of physics problem solving

Shared Model of Sense-making for Human-Machine Collaboration

Extending the 4I Organizational Learning Model: Information Sources, Foraging Processes and Tools

A Conceptual Design Method Based on C-K Theory and Large Language Models

What Did My AI Learn? How Data Scientists Make Sense of Model Behavior

CSKE: Commonsense Knowledge Enhanced Text Extension Framework for Text-Based Logical Reasoning.

A Logical Model for Supporting Social Commonsense Knowledge Acquisition

Supporting Sensemaking of Large Language Model Outputs at Scale

Cognitive framework for blended mathematical sensemaking in science

Selenite: Scaffolding Online Sensemaking with Comprehensive Overviews Elicited from Large Language Models

An extended view of conceptual metaphor theory

Clinical sensemaking: Advancing a conceptual learning model of clinical reasoning

Sensecape: Enabling Multilevel Exploration and Sensemaking with Large Language Models