Abstract:We offer a new model of the sensemaking process for data analysis and visualization. Whereas past sensemaking models have been grounded in positivist assumptions about the nature of knowledge, we reframe data sensemaking in critical, humanistic terms by approaching it through an interpretivist lens. Our three-phase process model uses the analogy of an iceberg, where data is the visible tip of underlying schemas. In the Add phase, the analyst acquires data, incorporates explicit schemas from the data, and absorbs the tacit schemas of both data and people. In the Check phase, the analyst interprets the data with respect to the current schemas and evaluates whether the schemas match the data. In the Refine phase, the analyst considers the role of power, articulates what was tacit into explicitly stated schemas, updates data, and formulates findings. Our model has four important distinguishing features: Tacit and Explicit Schemas, Schemas First and Always, Data as a Schematic Artifact, and Schematic Multiplicity. We compare the roles of schemas in past sensemaking models and draw conceptual distinctions based on a historical review of schemas in different academic traditions. We validate the descriptive and prescriptive power of our model through four analysis scenarios: noticing uncollected data, learning to wrangle data, downplaying inconvenient data, and measuring with sensors. We conclude by discussing the value of interpretivism, the virtue of epistemic humility, and the pluralism this sensemaking model can foster.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The key problem that this paper attempts to solve is the philosophical foundation problems existing in the current data understanding and visual analysis processes, especially how to consider social, cultural and political factors in data analysis. Specifically:
1. **Limitations of Existing Models**: Most of the past sensemaking models were based on positivist assumptions, that is, they believed that knowledge was objective truth obtained through experimental methods, and the application results of these methods should be independent of the analyst's personal perspective and position. This view ignores the subjective dimension in human judgment and the influence of social, cultural and political factors.
2. **Introducing an Interpretivist Perspective**: This paper proposes a new sensemaking process model based on interpretivism - the "Iceberg Sensemaking Model". This model compares data to the visible part of an iceberg, while the underlying knowledge frameworks or schemas are the large part hidden underwater. This is intended to emphasize that data itself is not the basis of knowledge, but part of a larger knowledge structure, which is often called "schema".
3. **Four Important Features**:
- **Tacit and Explicit Schemas**: It distinguishes between explicit schemas (such as the documentation of data sets) and tacit schemas (unspoken characteristics related to data creation, interpretation, etc.).
- **Schemas First and Always**: It points out that everyone carries tacit schemas shaped by past experiences and social conditions when making sense.
- **Data as a Schematic Artifact**: It emphasizes that each data set is constructed based on a certain schema, not objective facts.
- **Schematic Multiplicity**: It advocates actively considering multiple schemas throughout the understanding process to ensure responsible data analysis.
4. **Verifying the Validity of the Model**: The author verifies the practicality and transferability of this new model through four specific analysis scenarios, including noticing uncollected data, learning to process data, downplaying inconvenient data, and using sensors to measure.
In conclusion, this paper aims to provide a more comprehensive and more critical sensemaking process model, which can better deal with the biases and complexities existing in data - driven systems, while promoting the inclusiveness of different knowledge theories.