Abstract:The legal term "fundamental rights" has been well recognized in international treaties and legislations. The present study investigates the stipulations on fundamental rights in the four versions (1954, 1975, 1978, and 1982) of and four Amendments (1988, 1993, 1999, and 2004) to the Constitution of the People's Republic of China (PRC) from a sociosemiotic perspective. The findings in this study indicate that the provisions in the Constitution are crafted in such a manner that the dominant social and political participants employ them to maintain their ruling position and promote social and economic developments. In the successive versions and Amendments to the PRC Constitution, the evolution of the provisions on fundamental rights not only demonstrates the development of fundamental rights in China, but also illuminates the underlying mediation mainly among the Chinese government, the Communist Party of China (CPC), and Chinese people. The connotation and validity therein is constructed through communication and competition among various participants. It is therefore argued that the status quo of fundamental rights in China is the result of mediation among the relevant participants under the impact of the social and economic development. The State and the CPC are thus suggested to loosen their grips to promote Chinese people's participation in the mediation process with more attention to the social and economic reality. This study also implies that the definition of a legal term is constrained by other sign systems and hence the importance of an understanding of terminological dynamicity.

Paradigm of Rights-power Balance: Reviewing China's Researches of Media and Judicature (1993-2009)

Unveiling Human Rights Protection in China from the Perspective of Criminal Procedure Law

The Theoretical Prospect in the Age of Rights

Advancing Journalism Surveillance of Public Opinion from the Democratic Stature

A sociosemiotic approach to fundamental rights in China

Double-Speaking Human Rights: Analyzing Human Rights Conception in Chinese Politics (1989–2015)

Semantic Analysis and Its Paradigm of “Politics of Rights”

Research on Balancing the Conflict Between Law and Public Opinion in Judicial Judgment

The Norms Governing the Power——review of Normal Power,jurisprudential Research of Power

Paradox of China's Jurisprudence in Course Of Social Development

Not Self-evident "Chinese Legal Ideal-Picture"

Administration of Justice and Multimodality in Media: Semiotic Translation, Conflict and Compatibility

Media Supervision and Judicial Fairness——Relation between media reporting and judicial fairness in UK and its enlightenment

Modern Law in the Shifting Paradigms

Three Perspectives to Understand Public Policy Process and their Implications for China Study

Disputing Chinese Views on Power

Reflections of Research on Media Convergence Regulation:China-oriented Principle and Core Issue

On the Paradigms of Media Economics

History,Problems and Suggestions:30 Years of China's Research on Basic Rights

Regime-Centered and Court-Centered Understandings: the Reception of American Constitutional Law in Contemporary China

Regime-Centered and Court-Centered Understandings: the Reception of American Constitutional Law in Contemporary China†