Using a mechanical evaluation platform to assess three knot-tying techniques in transumbilical endoscopic surgery

徐安安,苏远涛,朱江帆,谢晓峰,王永坤,杨欲晓
DOI: https://doi.org/10.13499/j.cnki.fqjwkzz.2013.04.011
2013-01-01
Abstract:Objective:Knot tying is difficult but important for transumbilical endoscopic surgery(TUES).There are several techniques for TUES knot-tying.However,objective assessment of these skills has not yet been established.The aim of this study was to assess three different knot-tying techniques in TUES using a mechanical evaluation platform.Methods:The subject tied 8 knots with each of the three techniques in an inanimate box laparoscopic trainer while the movements of their instruments were evaluated using a TUES mechanical evaluation platform.The operations were assessed on the basis of the time and average load of the dominant hand.Results:There were significant differences of operation time and average load in all groups compared with each other(P<0.01).The longest time and largest average load were seen with the intracorporeal "side winding" technique [(90.48±17.21) s,(4.23±0.66) N].The extracorporeal knot-tying technique was more time and average load consuming in comparison to the intracorporeal one-hand knot-tying technique during the performance of knot-tying(P<0.01).Conclusions:The intracorporeal one-hand knot-tying technique shows better results than the intracorporeal "side winding" technique and the extracorporeal knot-tying technique in terms of the time and average load taken.Evaluation of knots quality should be integrated into the objective assessment.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?