Abstract:Unit-cell volumes (V) of Mg1−xFexSiO3 perovskite (x = 0.0 and 0.1) have been measured along several isobaric paths up to P = 11 GPa and T = 1300 K using a DIA-type, cubic anvil high-pressure apparatus (SAM-85). With a combination of X-ray diffraction during heating cycles and Raman spectroscopy on recovered samples, pressure and temperature conditions were determined under which the P-V-T behavior of the perovskite remains reversible. At 1 bar, perovskites of both compositions begin to transform to amorphous phases at T ≈ 400 K, accompanied by an irreversible cell volume contraction. Electron microprobe and analytical electron microscopy studies revealed that the iron-rich perovskite decomposed into at least two phases, which were Fe and Si enriched, respectively. At pressures above 4 GPa, the P-V-T behavior of MgSiO3 perovskite remained reversible up to about 1200 K, whereas the Mg0.9Fe0.1SiO3 exhibited an irreversible behavior on heating. Such irreversible behavior makes equation-of-state data on Fe-rich samples dubious. Thermal expansivities (αV) of MgSiO3 perovskite were measured directly as a function of pressure. Overall, our results indicate a weak pressure dependence in αV for MgSiO3. Analyses on the P-V-T data using various thermal equations of state yielded consistent results on thermoelastic properties. The temperature derivative of the bulk modulus, (∂KT∂T)P, is −0.023(±0.011) GPa K−1 for MgSiO3 perovskite. Using these new results, we examine the constraints imposed by αV and (∂K∂T)P on the Fe(Mg + Fe) and (Mg + Fe)Si ratios for the lower mantle. For a temperature of 1800 K at the foot of an adiabat (zero depth), these results indicate an overall iron content of Fe(Mg + Fe) = 0.12(1) for a lower mantle composed of perovskite and magnesiowüstite. Although the (Mg + Fe)Si ratio is very sensitive to the thermoelastic parameters of the perovskite and it is tentatively constrained between 1.4 and 2.0, these results indicate that it is unlikely for the lower mantle to have a perovskite stoichiometry.

Equations of State of Mgo and Epsilon-Fe under Static Pressure Conditions

Melting-pressure and Density Equations Ofhe3at Temperatures From0.001to30

Spin Transition and Equations of State of (mg, Fe)O Solid Solutions

Equation of State for Solids Considering Cohesive Energy and Anharmonic Effect and Its Application to MgO

Toward an accurate equation of state and B1-B2 phase boundary for magnesium oxide to TPa pressures and eV temperatures

Equations of State of Cao under Static Pressure Conditions

P-V-T Equation of State of Magnesiowstite (Mg0.6fe0.4)o

Experimental Determination of Element Partitioning and Calculation of Phase Relations in the MgO‐FeO‐SiO2 System at High Pressure and High Temperature

Hydrostatic Compression Of Gamma-Mg2sio4 To Mantle Pressures And 700-K - Thermal Equation Of State And Related Thermoelastic Properties

Error Analysis of Parameter-Fitting in Equations of State for Mantle Minerals

<i>P-V-T</i> equation of state of magnesiowüstite (Mg<sub>0.6</sub>Fe<sub>0.4</sub>)O

Hydrostatic compression of γ-Mg 2 SiO 4 to mantle pressures and 700 K: Thermal equation of state and related thermoelastic properties

Pressure-volume-temperature relations in MgO: An ultrahigh pressure-temperature scale for planetary sciences applications

Equations of State of Selected Solids for High-Pressure Research and Planetary Interior Density Models

Isothermal Equation of State of Aluminium

P-V-T Equation of State of (mg,fe)sio3 Perovskite: Constraints on Composition of the Lower Mantle

Hydrostatic compression of γ-Mg<sub>2</sub>SiO<sub>4</sub> to mantle pressures and 700 K: Thermal equation of state and related thermoelastic properties

Hydrostatic compression of γ-MgSiO to mantle pressures and 700 K: Thermal equation of state and related thermoelastic properties

Thermal equation of state of magnesite to 32 GPa and 2073 K

Evaluation of Pt and Au Pressure Scales Based on MgO Absolute Pressure Scale

Semi-empirical pressure-volume-temperature equation of state; MgSiO3 perovskite is an example