Abstract:With two-sided platforms becoming an increasingly ubiquitous business model, quality is a vital factor for the success of high-technology platforms that face fierce competition. To maintain competency, high-technology platforms commonly use two quality regulation strategies: the exclusion strategy (E strategy), in which the platform denies access to low-quality complementors, and the subsidization strategy (S strategy), in which the platform provides a fixed subsidy to high-quality complementors. This paper investigates the optimal quality regulation strategy for platforms in a duopoly setting. We examine and compare three scenarios: (i) both platforms adopt the exclusion strategy, i.e. mode EE, (ii) both platforms adopt the subsidization strategy, i.e. mode SS, and (ii) one platform adopts the subsidization strategy while the other adopts the exclusion strategy, i.e. mode SE. First, we find that although the developer network size is larger and the platforms charge developers higher access fees under SS, the average quality and the consumer access fees are lower under SS than under EE, leading to lower profits for platforms. Second, under SE, in comparison with the platform that adopts the exclusion strategy, the platform that uses the subsidization strategy achieves lower average quality and larger network sizes on both sides but may set higher or lower access fees on both sides. Moreover, the platform under the subsidization strategy profits more (less) when the operation cost on the developer side is high (low). Third, asymmetric mode SE does not necessarily induce moderate outcomes for market participants compared to modes EE and SS. We also examine the equilibrium mode by considering platforms’ optimal strategies for quality regulation. Our analyses reveal that as the operation cost on the developer side increases, the equilibrium mode evolves from EE to SE/ES and then to SS. These results and insights are robust to several alternative assumptions.

Strategy of Two-Sided Markets when Platforms Provides Services with Different Service Quality

EXPRESS: Exclusion or Subsidization? A Competitive Analysis of Quality Regulation Strategy for Two-sided Platforms

Pricing Strategy of Two-Sided Markets under Vertical Integration Structure

Pricing and Service Strategies for Two-sided Platforms

Quality Regulation on Two-Sided Platforms: Exclusion, Subsidization, and First-Party Application

Dynamic Competitive Strategy of Platforms with Indirect Network Externality

Two-sided dynamic pricing and value-added service investment strategies of competitive platforms considering indirect network effects

Price Strategy and Network-Size Allocation Strategy in a Two-Sided Monopoly Market

Performance Investment Decision and Pricing Strategy for Platforms Considering Two‐sided Users' Different Preferences

Effects of Pricing Schemes and Platform Types on Platform-Based Logistics Services.

Two-sided competition, platform services and online shopping market structure

Pricing Power Conflict and Cooperation Strategies of Competing Two‐Sided Platforms: Impact of the Differentiated Value‐Added Services and Cross‐Network Effects

Equilibrium Pricing, Advertising, and Quality Strategies in a Platform Service Supply Chain.

Crossing Network Externality and Skewed Pricing in Two-sided Markets

Research on the Pricing Strategy of Bilateral Platform from the Perspective of Technology Heterogeneous

Pricing and Quality Strategies for an On-Demand Housekeeping Platform with Customer-Intensive Services

Pricing Strategies of a Monopoly Platform in the Video Game Industry

Pricing of Platforms in Two-Sided Markets with Heterogeneous Agents and Limited Market Size

Service pricing and charging strategy for video platforms considering consumer preferences

Pricing Models in Two-Sided Markets with Asymmetric Conditions

Pricing Strategies for Mobile Service Products with Vertical Differentiation