Evaluation of New Methods for Differentiating the Diagnosis of Sarcoidosis and Smear/culture-Negative Tuberculosis

何亦凡,李惠萍
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1671-2870.2013.02.011
2013-01-01
Abstract:Objective To verify and evaluate the real-time quantitative PCR to detect Mycobacterium tuberculosis DNA(TB-PCR) and the clinical-pathological-imaging scoring system for differentiating the diagnosis of sarcoidosis and smear/culture negative tuberculosis.Methods Ninety-one patients with proliferating granulomatosis could not be definitely diagnosed as sarcoidosis or tuberculosis were enrolled in this study.Real-time quantitative PCR detecting Mycobacterium tuberculosis DNA and clinical-pathological-imaging scoring system were used for differentiating sarcoidosis and tuberculosis.These two methods were assessed by follow up concordance analysis.Results ①Analyzed by TB-PCR: 77 samples were negative and 14 were positive(the positive rate was 15.4%),When compared with the follow-up result,74 of the 77 TB-PCR negative patients were diagnosed as sarcoidosis,2 were diagnosed as tuberculosis,1 was unable to confirm the diagnosis.Of the 14 TB-PCR positive patients,3 were diagnosed as tuberculosis,8 were diagnosed as sarcoidosis,and 3 were unable to confirm the diagnosis.The percentage of definite diagnosis was 84.6%(77/91),and the diagnostic accuracy rate for sarcoidosis is 93.9%(77/82).②Analyzed by the clinical-pathological-imaging scoring system,80 of 91 samples were diagnosed as sarcoidosis and 11 were diagnosed as tuberculosis.When compared with the follow-up result,75 of the 80 diagnosed by the scoring system as sarcoidosis were diagnosed again as sarcoidosis,1 was diagnosed as tuberculosis,4 were unable to confirm the diagnosis.Of the11 diagnosed as tuberculosis by the scoring system,4 were diagnosed as tuberculosis,7 were diagnosed as sarcoidosis.The percentage of definite diagnosis was 86.8%(79/91),and the diagnostic accuracy rate for sarcoidosis was 97.56%(80/82).Conclusions These two methods can help the diagnosis and differentiating the diagnosis of sarcoidosis from smear/culture-negative tuberculosis in clinical practice.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?