Clinical diagnosis of primary carcinoma of ureter (Report of 28 cases)

LI Yingchuan,DING Qiang,LIU Jun
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1001-1420.2006.02.015
2006-01-01
Journal of Clinical Urology
Abstract:Objective:To improve the diagnosis of primary ureteral carcinoma.Methods:We conducted a retrospective study of 28 cases during the past 8 years from Feb. 1995 to May 2003, different diagnostic methods were evaluated.Results:The patients consisted of 20 males and 8 females. Among 28 cases, 25( 89.3%) had symptoms of gross hematuria, 10( 35.7%) had hematuria concomitant with flank pain, 3( 10.7%) had sole flank pain, abdominal mass had been palpated in 1( 3.6%); 7( 25.0%) were definitely diagnosed out of 28 by B-ultrasound, 3( 11.5%)out of 26 by IVU, 7( 36.8%)out of 19 by cystoscopy, 9( 90.0%)out of 10 by retrograde urography, 6( 37.5%)out of 16 by CT, 6( 40.0%)out of 15 by MRU; 20 received urinary cytology, carcinoma cells were found in the urine of 11( 55.0%), 2 were diagnosed by ureteroscopy.Conclusions:The rational application of these methods with attention to symptoms and signs were keys to improve accuracy of diagnosis.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?