Abstract:This paper examines recent English publications regarding Qing history, especially focusing on the works of Mark Elliott and Pamela Crossley, the two leading scholars in the field. “New Qing History” – a name for recent scholarship on Qing history, which has shared common interests in Manchu language materials and Inner Asian tradition in the Qing empire – has been widely discussed and read in Korea. This group of scholars has challenged the theory of sinicization, and instead highlighted important roles of non-Han people who have long been considered as “inferior barbarians,” especially the Manchus and Mongols, in Chinese history. There are also some disagreements found among these scholars, most notably regarding the question of how to understand ethnicity in the Qing history. Mark Elliott argues that Manchu ethnic identity had played a decisive role in the formation of the Qing state, and the distinctive cultural traits of the Manchu people – or the Manchuness in his word – had remained throughout the dynasty. Pamela Crossley refutes Elliott’s idea that many elements of the Manchuness, such as frugality and martial skills, were in fact products of the Qing imperial ideology. She addresses that the Manchu identity were constantly transformed by the Qing court’s interests. If Elliott explains the Qing history as the Manchu empire, Crossley offers the Qing empire, which included not only the Manchus but other imperial constituencies, such as the Mongol, Tibetan, and Uyghur. Understandings of these divergences in “New Qing History” help examine the ways in which the Qing made its relationships with neighboring countries. As long as the Qing had been transformed itself, its foreign policies changed as well. If the Qing court modified the history of the Manchus and the Mongols, so did to the Choson. As such, various questions raised in “New Qing History” can shed new light on the understanding of the Qing and Choson relationship.

On the Manchu Clan, Lineage Cultural and Tribal Identity

How Manchu Became A Nation——Historical Evolvement of Manchu Identity before Middle Qing Dynasty

"Collective Name" to Taiwan's Aborigines in the Perspective of Cultural Differences

Lineage Ethos in a Local and Patrilineal Perspective:A Historical-Anthropological Study of Yixu Lineage in Eastern Fujian,1100-1930

Genetic Trail for the Early Migrations of Aisin Gioro, the Imperial House of the Qing Dynasty

A New Research into the Myth of the First Ancestor of the Manchu"Three Fairies"

Fang,Pai,and Family:Lineage Units and the Grand Genealogy of the Nation:Cases of Genealogies in the Song Dynasty and in South China Chinese Full Text

Several Issues concerning the Ethnic Relations in Northeast China from the ~(15)th Century to the ~(17)th Century:A Case Study of the Development of the Ethnic Community in Manchuria

Identification of Manchu Document's Version

A research to the famous clan of Gansu in Qin Dynasty

Genomic Insight Into the Population Admixture History of Tungusic-Speaking Manchu People in Northeast China

Manzhou's Orientation towards Han Culture and its Inheritance of Chinese Culture

On the Achievement of Manchu Minority Scholars about Confucian Classics in Qing Dynasty

Identification of Kinship and Occupant Status in Mongolian Noble Burials of the Yuan Dynasty Through a Multidisciplinary Approach.

Unveiling 2,000 years of differentiation among Tungusic-speaking populations: a revised phylogeny of the paternal founder lineage C2a-M48-SK1061

Paleolithic Divergence and Multiple Neolithic Expansions of Ancestral Nomadic Emperor-related Paternal Lineages

The genetic structure and admixture of Manchus and Koreans in northeast China

Y Chromosome of Aisin Gioro, the Imperial House of Qing Dynasty

Qing Shaman Rituals and Myths of Sacrifice

Ideological Culture Analysis of the Titles of Yuan and Qing Dynasties

The Manchu Empire or The Qing Empire? - A Critical Review on ‘New Qing History’ -