Abstract:We investigate the use of follow-up samples of individuals to estimate survival curves from studies that are subject to right censoring from two sources: (i) early termination of the study, namely, administrative censoring, or (ii) censoring due to lost data prior to administrative censoring, so-called dropout. We assume that, for the full cohort of individuals, administrative censoring times are independent of the subjects' inherent characteristics, including survival time. To address the loss to censoring due to dropout, which we allow to be possibly selective, we consider an intensive second phase of the study where a representative sample of the originally lost subjects is subsequently followed and their data recorded. As with double-sampling designs in survey methodology, the objective is to provide data on a representative subset of the dropouts. Despite assumed full response from the follow-up sample, we show that, in general in our setting, administrative censoring times are not independent of survival times within the two subgroups, nondropouts and sampled dropouts. As a result, the stratified Kaplan-Meier estimator is not appropriate for the cohort survival curve. Moreover, using the concept of potential outcomes, as opposed to observed outcomes, and thereby explicitly formulating the problem as a missing data problem, reveals and addresses these complications. We present an estimation method based on the likelihood of an easily observed subset of the data and study its properties analytically for large samples. We evaluate our method in a realistic situation by simulating data that match published margins on survival and dropout from an actual hip-replacement study. Limitations and extensions of our design and analytic method are discussed.

Measuring Inequality Using Censored Data: A Multiple Imputation Approach

Recovering income distribution in the presence of interval-censored data

Multiple Imputation of Missing Categorical and Continuous Values via Bayesian Mixture Models with Local Dependence

Robust Estimation of Inequality from Binned Incomes

Pareto's Limits: Improving Inequality Estimates in America, 1917 to 1965

The Analysis of Alternative Interval-Censored and Complete Data

Estimating Racial Disparities When Race is Not Observed

Causal Inference with Corrupted Data: Measurement Error, Missing Values, Discretization, and Differential Privacy

A New measure of income inequality

Interpolating Population Distributions using Public-use Data: An Application to Income Segregation using American Community Survey Data

Measuring Within and Between Group Inequality in Early-Life Mortality Over Time: A Bayesian Approach with Application to India

Addressing an Idiosyncrasy in Estimating Survival Curves Using Double Sampling in the Presence of Self‐Selected Right Censoring

Benchmarking Observational Studies with Experimental Data under Right-Censoring

Examining the impact of topcodes adjustment on studies of gender earnings inequality in the US: evidence from March CPS data

Multiple Imputation of Industry and Occupation Codes in Census Public-use Samples Using Bayesian Logistic Regression

Measuring inequality beyond the Gini coefficient may clarify conflicting findings

Inference for censored quantile regression models in longitudinal studies

An Inverse Probability Weighted Regression Method that Accounts for Right-censoring for Causal Inference with Multiple Treatments and a Binary Outcome

Causal inference targeting a concentration index for studies of health inequalities

Measuring Changes in Disparity Gaps: An Application to Health Insurance

Censored quantile regression based on multiply robust propensity scores.