Comparasion of totally extraperitoneal and transabdominal preperitoneal laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair
Xiaofeng Qiu,Jie Kang,Bomin Guo,Xianzhao Deng,Zheng Ding,Bo Wu,Youben Fan,Zhenxi Yang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-392X.2014.04.010
2014-01-01
Abstract:Objective To investigate and compare the clinical efficacy and safety of totally extraperitoneal hernia repair (TEP)and transabdominal preperitoneal hernia repair (TAPP).Methods A total of 1 26 patients who underwent laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair in Shanghai Seventh People′s Hospital,from January 201 1 to June 201 3,were retrospective analyzed.The patients were randomly assigned into two groups,as observation group with TEP (n =56 )and control group with TAPP (n =70 ).The operation time,length of postoperative stay,costs of hospitalization,complications,and recurrences were compared between both groups.Results The operation time was (60 ±5 )minutes in observation group, and was (65 ± 6 )minutes in control group,there was a statistically significant difference between the groups (t=1 0.1 5,P=0.022).Length of stay in observation and control group,were (5 ±2)days and (6 ±2)days,respectively;no significant differences existed (t=3.68,P=0.076).However,2 cases of recurrence occurred in control group,none in observation.This difference was statistically significant (χ2 =0.31 ,P=0.020).The average cost in observation group was (7 246 ± 671 ),less than in control group (1 2 387 ±743)(t=1 3.25,P=0.001 ).No significant difference was found in complication rate between the two groups(χ2 =1 .05,P=0.075).Conclusion Both TEP and TAPP are safe and effective for inguinal hernia;however, TEP has relatively shorter operation time and less costs, which demonstrates more advantages in clinical practice.