Significance of Atrial Fibrillation/atrial Flutter in Prognosis in Patients with Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

邹阳春,杨新春,王乐丰,崔亮,高明明,张麟,那开宪
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1004-8812.2005.06.011
2005-01-01
Abstract:Objective Previous studies have reported that the incidence of atrial fibrillation (AF)/atrial fluttler in patients with AMI who were treated with thrombolysis is 7%-10%. However, little is known concerning the incidence of AF/atrial fluttler and its effects on the prognosis of patients with AMI who are treated with PCI. Methods A total of 668 consecutive patients were studied in Beijing Chaoyang Hospital from Nov. 2000 to Jan. 2004. Patients were categorized into 2 groups according to the presence of AF/ atrial flutter. Results The results showed that the incidence of AF/atrial fluttler was 10% and that the patients with AF/atrial fluttler were older, were in higher Killip classes, had higher rates of previous myocardial infarction and previous cerebrovascular diseases, multivessel disease, and had poorer reperfusion of the infarc-related artery than those without AF/atrial fluttler. Patients with AF/atrial fluttler had higher in-hospital (11.9% vs 5.3%, P0.05) mortality than those without AF/atrial fluttler. Multivariate Cox regrssion analysis revealed that AF/atrial fluttler was an independent predictor of in-hospital mortality (risk ratio 1.36, 95% confidence interval 1.01-2.08, P0.05). Conclusion Current AF, and the development of new AF soon after AMI, is associated with increased risk of death.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?