Abstract:Natural capital accounting is an essential prerequisite for the harmonious development of human beings and nature and benign interactions between economy and environment. Although the ecological footprint has significantly contributed to sustainability evaluation for many years, the traditional ecological footprint model is limited by lack of value accounting, incomplete account content, neglect of multi-functions of land, and geographical spatial heterogeneity. These limitations reduce the universality of this model. To improve the value accounting of the ecological footprint model, this study takes national hectares (nha) as the measurement unit and includes the freshwater and pollution footprints. The dynamic changes of natural capital from 2000 to 2018 were calculated and analyzed in 31 Chinese provinces. The main findings are summarized here. China's physical quantity of ecological footprint, ecological carrying capacity, and ecological deficit in 2018 was 4.03, 0.79, and -3.24 billion nha, respectively. The energy account contributed most of the physical quantity in the ecological footprint (72.12% of the total). From 2000 to 2018, the physical quantities of the per capita ecological footprint and the per capita ecological deficit increased at 5.49% and 10.08% per annum, respectively, while the physical quantity of the per capita ecological carrying capacity decreased by 0.55% per annum. The physical quantities of the per capita ecological footprint and per capita ecological deficit were spatially distributed, reducing in the order of East > Central > West. The spatial distribution of the physical quantity of the per capita ecological carrying capacity showed the opposite trend. By 2018, China's ecological footprint, ecological carrying capacity, and ecological deficit were valued at 18.09, 12.44 and CNY -5.65 trillion, respectively. Over the 2000-2018 period, the per capita ecological footprint and ecological carrying capacity increased by 495 and CNY 370 per annum, respectively, while the per capita ecological deficit expanded at CNY -125 per annum. The biological account contributed approximately 59.53% of the value quantity of the ecological footprint. Since the twenty-first century, the cumulative effect of excessive consumption has placed increasing pressure on China's ecosystems. On mainland China, only Tibet showed an ecological surplus in 2018. The ecological pressure index decreased in the order of East > Central > West. As Western China has developed extensively and its ecological deficit is rapidly expanding, this region deserves special attention. The most ecologically challenging regions in China are Shanghai, Tianjin, and Beijing. In contrast, Jilin, Qinghai, and Tibet impose low ecological pressure in China. These findings contribute to the standardization and localization of the ecological footprint model in China and provide a reference for regional resource management and ecological construction.

Assessment on Natural Capital of Regional Ecosystem——Taking Yuzhong County in Gansu Province as An Example

Measuring Gross Ecosystem Product (GEP) of 2015 for Terrestrial Ecosystems in China

Assessment of Ecosystem Service Value and Its Differences in the Yellow River Basin and Yangtze River Basin

Study on China's Gross Economic-ecological Product Accounting in 2015

Evaluating Value of Natural Landscapes in China

Valuing the Natural Capital of Sea Areas Based on Emergy Analysis

Assessment Method and Application of Urban Ecological Assets: a Case Study in Zengcheng, Guangzhou City

Ecological Capital Evaluation and Its Relation to Economy based on GIS in Xianju County

First Report of the National Natural Resources Balance Sheet for Huzhou City and Anji County

Optimizing the Valuation and Implementation Path of the Gross Ecosystem Product: A Case Study of Tonglu County, Hangzhou City

Valuing natural capital amidst rapid urbanization: assessing the gross ecosystem product (GEP) of China’s ‘Chang-Zhu-Tan’ megacity

Measuring and decomposing natural capital use in Xinjiang from a regional-industry perspective

Accounting for the value of ecosystem assets: from value judgments to management needs—take Yancheng City as an example

Ecosystem Service Value Assessment for National Key Eco-Function Zones for Water and Soil Conservation

A modified ecological footprint analysis to a sub-national area: The case study of Zheiian? Province

Assessment of physical quantity and value of natural capital in China since the 21st century based on a modified ecological footprint model

The Value of Ecological Assets Based on Land Cover/Use Pattern in Kunming, Yunnan Province

Natural capital accounting of land resources based on ecological footprint and ecosystem services value

Changes in gross ecosystem product and its response to land use changes in forest resource dominant regions: A case study of Zixi County, Jiangxi Province, China

Assessment of the Ecological Carrying Capacity Based on High Resolution Data: A Case Study of Yuxian, China

Analysis of the Internal Relationship between Ecological Value and Economic Value Based on the Forest Resources in China