Contrastive Study of DIPS and TIPS

Luo Jianjun,Yan Zhiping,Wang Jianhua
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1006-5741.2006.06.012
2006-01-01
Abstract:Purpose:To evaluate the feasibility and safety of creating direct intrahepatic portacaval shunt (DIPS) between portal vein and retrohepatic segment of inferior vena cava (RHSIVC). To compare the events of complications, post-procedure 30 days' therapeutic effect and short-term patency of shunt after DIPS with those after TIPS procedure.Materials and Methods:Cirrhotic patients needed for interventional therapy were assigned into group D (DIPS) and group T (TIPS) randomly. DIPS and TIPS procedure was performed on the patients of group D and T respectively. Changes of patient's laboratory examination values, portosystemic pressure gradient, parameters of intrahepatic portacaval shunt, post-procedure 30 days' therapeutic effect and events of complications during follow-up were compared one by one between 2 groups.Patency of shunt was followed by color doppler sonograph and analyzed by Kaplan-Meier analysis.Results:30 cirrhotic patients (M/F 27/3) were enrolled into this study. 14 and 16 patients were assigned into group D and group T respectively. All intrahepatic portosystemic shunts were successfully created in these 30 patients. Kaplan-Meier analysis of two groups yielded a primary patency of(188±19.8)d for group D and(171.3±15.8)d for group T respectively (P=0.648).Conclusion:Our initial experience demonstrated that DIPS was feasible and safe and will become a new interventional approach for treating portal hypertension.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?