Combined-stent covered technique and single covered stent technique for transjugular intrahepatic porto-systemic shunt: a prospective randomized controlled study

王昌明,李选,傅军,吕献军,栾景源,李天润,赵军,董国祥
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1008-794X.2014.01.006
2014-01-01
Abstract:Objective To compare the technique of combined stents with that of single stent-graft for the construction of transjugular intrahepatic porto - systemic shunt (TIPS) and to discuss their clinical outcomes. Methods During the period from April 2011 to Dec. 2012, a total of 30 patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding due to portal hypertension were admitted to the hospital. TIPS procedure was carried out in all the 30 patients. The patients were randomly allocated into either combined-stent group (n = 17) or stent-graft group (control group, n = 13) on the basis of a computer-generated randomization sequence. The PSG quality control, the patency rate of portal vein branches and the shunts, the incidence of encephalopathy and the survival rate of the two groups were documented and analyzed. Results Technical success rate was 100%. After the treatment, in both groups the PSG became significantly lower than the PSG determined before the treatment (P < 0.000). According to quality control chart, the of combined stents was superior to stent-graft technique in effectively controlling PSG. Five days after TIPS, the ammonia level in the combinedstent group was significantly decreased (P = 0.029), while in the control group the ammonia level showed no significant changes (P = 0.065). One patient died shortly after TIPS. The median follow -up time was 181 days. During the follow-up period death occurred in 3 cases in each group. The difference in the survival rate between the two groups was no significant (P = 0.906). Of the three patients who developed encephalopathy, two were in the combined-stent group and one was in the control group. After medication the symptoms of encephalopathy were relieved. The patency rate of the shunts was 100% and the re-bleeding rate was 0% for both groups. The patency rate of portal vein branches was significantly higher in the combined-stent group than that in the control group (P = 0.039). Conclusion For the construction of TIPS, the technique of combined-stent is superior to single stent-graft technique. The advantages of combined - stent technique are as follows : the accurate position of stents, the patency rate of portal branches, the stabilization of ammonia, the modification of PSG, etc. Nevertheless, the rate of shunt patency, the incidence of re-bleeding as well as encephalopathy, and the survival rate of the two groups are similar.(J Intervent Radiol, 2014, 23: 18-23).
What problem does this paper attempt to address?