Abstract:Literary criticism was an important part of Western literary theory in the 20th century and has not lost its importance to this day. Criticism has an active influence on the literary process, as well as directly on the formation of public consciousness. This article discusses two important approaches, the principle of literary criticism. The archetypal literary criticism and the theory of intertextuality. Archetypal literary criticism is a theory that interprets a text by focusing on mythological motifs and archetypes in narrative, symbols, imagery, and character types that recur in different literary works. Analysis of the inclusions of intertext in the text of a work of art gives reason to consider them as one of the most important devices in the writer's stylistic system. The ability to integrate elements of another text into one's own work and introduce one's own text into the public consciousness is called "intertextualization" within the framework of this theory. Intertextuality is a common property of texts, expressed in the presence of links between them, due to which texts (or parts of them) can explicitly or implicitly refer to each other in a variety of ways. It is worth noting that the archetypal literary criticism and the theory of intertextuality have deep internal theoretical connections, which boil down to three main points: these are literary repetitions, general views on literature, and the consideration of literature as a repository of memory. Although these theories arose in the era of different cultural and historical paradigms - structuralism and post-structuralism, they have much in common in terms of connotation. Being different theoretical systems of literary criticism, archetypal criticism and intertextuality are closely connected by the presence of an element of psychological criticality in both. This article searches for similarities between the two indicated systems in these three aspects and substantiates their theoretical connection, which proves the complementary nature of these two theories.

Text and reader under historical, literary and cultural criticism

Towards A Cultural Study of Literature: ON the Course of Literary Study from Works to Texts

Internet and literary translation criticism

The formation, development, and transformation of contemporary chinese literary criticism

The Intrinsic Relationship Between Literary Theory and Criticism — Based on the Analysis of Bressler's "Literary Criticism: An Introduction to Theory and Practice"

Three Forms of Literary Texts and Theoretical Foundations of Ethical Literary Criticism

Text Reading of Marx Works under the Background of Difference

Archetypal literary criticism and intertextuality

Research of the Origin of Chinese Literary Criticism in the 20th Century

About the Chinese School of Comparative Literature

How to Understand the Person and How to Trace Back His Mind: the Reflection of a Traditional Method of Literary Criticism

Reflections on Metacritical Analysis

Studies of Text Linguistics in Perspective of Marxist Philosophy

Comparative Literature and the Third Literary Criticism——And on the Possibility of Comparative Literature Involvement in the Study of Contemporary Literature

Textual Meaning in the Complex System of Literature

Reflections on Modern Comparative Literature in the United States

The Historicity of Literary Genres and the Emergence of Modern Chinese Literary Criticism

Review of the Linguistic Studies on Intertextuality

The Yale School of Deconstruction and Its Significance to Intertextuality and Translation

The Continuous Review,Reflection and Reconstruction of Literary Criticism---Reaction to The Spatial Turn and Studies of Contemporary Western Marxist Literary Criticism

Linguistic Paradigm and Text Study