Structure of Constitutional Right Norm and Its Reasoning Model

Xu Jiqiang
2010-01-01
Abstract:Since the constitutional rights clauses tend to be highly abstract and generalized,their meaning should be clearly articulated by either legislation drafting or the exercise of constitutional review so as to protect citizens' rights.The process of articulation should not be arbitrary and should be subject to objective reasoning. The key issue is whether the constitutional rights can be restricted to accommodate other constitutional interests,public policy or other rights.There are two polarized theories concerning to this issue.One contends that constitutional rights are absolutely exclusive,while the other allows the flexibility for balancing.However,the constitutional rights tend to lay out a complicated structure with a combination of exclusiveness and flexibility,as is evident in both the text and application of the majority Constitutions in the world.Consequently,the constitutional right reasoning is a double—layer structure that includes both balancing and non—balancing features. Thus the initial rights enjoyed by the citizens are not always superior to the public policy. And the restriction of constitutional rights is not always prohibited.The core of the constitutional rights implementation lies on the legitimization of the restriction.And the legal effect of constitutional right norms can not only be judged by the internal characters of rights,but by the balancing of other elements. Given that in China the primary approach of implementing constitutional rights is through legislation,the structural characters and the reasoning process of those rights have not yet be demonstrated.But this fact relates to the fundamental problems of whether the government wants to protect constitutional rights and whether the citizens can actually enjoy those rights.International experiences tell us that the constitutional rights reasoning should accommodate democratic and rational values.The structure of constitutional right norms and its reasoning model abovementioned are just the mechanism which can make it.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?