Abstract:Background: Automatic segmentation of knee cartilage and quantification of cartilage parameters are crucial for the early detection and treatment of knee osteoarthritis (OA). The aim of this study was to develop an automatic cartilage segmentation method for three-dimensional water-selective (3D_WATS) cartilage magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and conduct cartilage morphometry and magnetic susceptibility measurements such as cartilage thickness, volume, and susceptibility values for knee OA assessment. Methods: Sixty-five consecutively sampled subjects, who had undergone health checks at our hospital, were enrolled in this cross-sectional study and were divided into three groups: 20 normal, 20 mild OA, 25 severe OA. Sagittal 3D_WATS sequence was used to image cartilage at 3T. The raw magnitude images were used for cartilage segmentation and the phase images were used for quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM)based assessment. Manual cartilage segmentation was performed by two experienced radiologists, and the automatic segmentation model was constructed using nnU-Net. Quantitative cartilage parameters were extracted from the magnitude and phase images based on the cartilage segmentation. Pearson correlation coefficient and intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) were then used to assess the consistency of obtained cartilage parameters between automatic and manual segmentation. Cartilage thickness, volume, and susceptibility values among different groups were compared using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). Support vector machine (SVM) was used to further verify the classification validity of automatically extracted cartilage parameters. Results: The constructed cartilage segmentation model based on nnU-Net achieved an average Dice score of 0.93. The consistency of cartilage thickness, volume, and susceptibility values calculated using automatic and manual segmentations ranged from 0.98 to 0.99 (95% CI: 0.89-1.00) for the Pearson correlation coefficient, and from 0.91-0.99 (95% CI: 0.86-0.99) for ICC, respectively. Significant differences were found in OA patients; including decreases in cartilage thickness, volume, and mean susceptibility values (P<0.05), and increases in standard deviation ( SD) of susceptibility values (P< 0.01). Moreover, the automatically extracted cartilage parameters can achieve an AUC value of 0.94 (95% CI: 0.89-0.96) for OA classification using the SVM classifier. Conclusions: The 3D_WATS cartilage MR imaging allows simultaneously automated assessment of cartilage morphometry and magnetic susceptibility for evaluating the severity of OA using the proposed cartilage segmentation method.

Comparison of cartilage signal intensity in different magnetic resonance imaging

Comparison of Different 3T MR Sequences in Detecting Articular Cartilage

Comparison of MR DESS, MEDIC, TrueFISP Sequences for Knee Cartilage

MR Imaging of Articular Cartilage at 1.5T and 3.0T: Comparison of SPGR and SSFP Sequences.

Comparison of the Relativity of MRI Appearance of Cartilage Injuries and Postoperative Effect of Arthroscope on Articular Cartilage Disease of Knee

Hyaline Cartilage Imaging with Improved FS-3D-TrueFISP Sequence: Comparison with Conventional Sequences

Three Dimensional Assessment of Knee Cartilage in Cadavers with High Resolution MR-Arthrography and MSCT-Arthrography

Quantitative magnetic resonance imaging had higher sensitivity in diagnosing chondral lesions of the knee: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Clinical study on improving the diagnostic accuracy of adult elbow joint cartilage injury by multisequence magnetic resonance imaging

Assessment of mechanical properties of articular cartilage with quantitative three-dimensional ultrashort echo time (UTE) cones magnetic resonance imaging

Cartilage Morphometry and Magnetic Susceptibility Measurement for Knee Osteoarthritis with Automatic Cartilage Segmentation

Knee Osteoarthritis:The Correlation Between Cartilage Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Matrix Components Expression

Comparison of T1ρ,MR and arthroscopy in the diagnosis of knee joint cartilage

Quantitatively Relating Magnetic Resonance T1 and T2 to Glycosaminoglycan and Collagen Concentrations Mediated by Penetrated Contrast Agents and Biomacromolecule-Bound Water

Feasibility of 3D MRI fingerprinting for rapid knee cartilage T1, T2, and T1ρ mapping at 0.55T: Comparison with 3T

The Relationship Between Cartilage Injury Degree Confirmed by MRI and Postoperative Effect of Arthroscope in Knee Osteoarthritis

Fat-Suppressed 3D T1-Weighted Gradient-Echo Imaging of the Cartilage with a Volumetric Interpolated Breath-Hold Examination

Preliminary study of Isotropic MR Imaging in the examination of the ankle: compared with conventional examination technique

Repeatability of Quantitative Knee Cartilage T1, T2, and T1ρ Mapping With 3D-MRI Fingerprinting

Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Non-Invasive Clinical Evaluation of Normal and Regenerated Cartilage.

Comparative Study Between MR T2-mapping of Cartilage and Severe Classification of Plain Film in Knee Osteoarthritis