Abstract:The development of International Relations theory (IRT) in China has been framed by three debates since 1979. The first was about China's opening up to the outside world. It started with the question of whether the world was characterized by ‘war and revolution’ or ‘peace and development’ between orthodox and reformist scholars and continued to focus on China's interest between orthodox scholars and the newly rising Chinese realists. It resulted in a wide acceptance of the reformist argument that peace and development characterized our era and of the realist view that China was a normal nation-state and should have its own legitimate national interest. The second started in the early 1990s and centered on the better way of realizing China's national interest. It was between Chinese realists and liberals. While the former emphasized national power, the latter proposed the alternative approach of international institutions. The third debate was on China's peaceful rise. It evolved at the turn of the century, when all the three major American IRTs, realism, liberalism, and constructivism, had been introduced into China and therefore the debate was more a tripartite contention. Realists believed that it was impossible for any major power to rise peacefully, while liberals and constructivists both supported the peaceful-rise argument. Liberals stressed more the tangible benefits derived from international institutions and constructivists explored more China's identity in its increasing interaction with international society. Although it was Chinese constructivists who explicitly discussed the identity issue, all the three debates and all the debating sides have reflected this century puzzle since the Opium War – China's identity vis-à-vis international society. These debates have helped push forward the IRT development in China and at the same time established Western IRT as the dominant discourse. A new round of debate seems likely to occur and may center on the question of the world order. This time it may help the newly burgeoning but highly dynamic Chinese IRT to develop and contribute to the enrichment of IRT as knowledge of human life.

Hu Shih and Institute of Pacific Relations——With comments on the dilemma of modern Chinese liberalism

On "human Rights Activities" and Expression of Freedom Thoughts

The Unsuccessful Efforts to Foster the Pacific Community The Activities of the Institute of Pacific Relations and Their Influence

Some Thoughts about Modern Chinese Private Institution of Higher Learning

On the Change of Chinese Intellectuals; Diplomatic Stand to Japan around Anti-Japanese War: With a Focus on China Institute of Pacific Relations

Liberty in Harmony: An Integration of Confucian Harmony and Liberalism in Contemporary China

The Emergence of Liberalism in China and Its Significance in the Period of after World War Ⅱ

Classical Liberalism in China: Some History and Prospects.

The Chinese Liberal Party in the Archives of Dr.Tsiang Tingfu

Development of International Relations theory in China: progress through debates

Interpreting ''Liberty'': An Analysis Of The History Of Ideas

Hu Shi and the Critical Review Group

Will the History Happen Again?——the Argument Between S.R.Chow and Hu Shih in 1948 and Its Meaning

Gu Weijun at His Political Crossraods─A Research of Liberalist in a Dilemma

A Study of the Japanese Anti-China Propaganda on the Manchurian Problem Around September 18 Incident——With Concentration on Japan Institute of Pacific Relations

Liberal Ideas of the "Liberal" Newspapers and Magazines in Early Republican China

Searching China's Cultural Orientation in the Contemporary Internation a Organizations

"The Principle of 'Minsheng'" in Modern Chinese History of Ideas

Twentieth-Century Chinese Politics and Western Political Science

A Global Perspective of the Independence of Social Sciences in China

On the Three Components of the Paradigm of Huaxia Doctrine International Relations