Abstract:Scale effects of urban land intensive use evaluation was of utmost importance but are rarely drawn attention in much research.In the present work,the authors selected commonly used land intensive use assessment indices,i.e.,investment per area and output value per area,to investigate intensive use levels of industry plots in Baoan district of Shenzhen City.By comparing the assessment results at neighborhood scale and plot scale,it was found that scale effect clearly existed when the same index was used at different spatial scales to describe spatial characteristics of urban land intensive use.For instance,there showed a relatively high value of investment per area at the plot scale for the region near the boundary between Longhua and Dalang.However,at neighborhood scale,the investment per area of Longhua was ranked two of Baoan district,and Dalang only ranked six of these ten neighborhoods.Furthermore,the authors discussed in detail the influence of land use pattern including land quantity structure and land distribution pattern on the scale effects.First,the plots were classified into several levels by the evaluation indices.Then,land quantity structure of each neighborhood was calculated as the sum of plots'evaluation index value with its area weighted.Last,each neighborhood's pattern index was calculated using Fragstats3.3,namely the Shannon diversity index,dominance index,evenness index and contagion index.Results indicated that land quantity structure leaded to significant effects on urban intensive use evaluation at higher spatial scale,and land distribution pattern determined the spatial form of urban land intensive use(the contagion index was a useful indicator to land aggregation).So some places might show high land intensive use levels at macro-scale,but had no high value plot gathering in micro-scale.In addition,if the land quantity structure of two neighborhoods were similar with each other,the land distribution pattern showed a notable effect on urban land intensive use level.The dominance index and evenness index reflected the importance of reasonable distribution of urban land use.The study suggested that using the same index to evaluate urban land intensive use at different scales would obtain different results or even adverse results.So it would be difficult to evaluate urban land intensive use and obtain reasonable results only by accounting for one scale.It is not appropriate to use evaluation results at one spatial scale to decide land management at another scale.

Studies on the Spatial Inequality of Benefits of Urban Land Use

SPATIAL DIFFERENCE OF URBAN LAND INTENSIVEUSE BASED ON THE GIS AND PSR MODEL——A CASE STUDY OF ZHEJIANG PROVINCE

Evaluation on Comprehensive Benefit and Spatial-temporal Variance for Urban Land:A Case of Zhejiang Province

An evaluation framework for the sustainability of urban land use: A study of capital cities and municipalities in China

Research on the Performance of Urban Land Use in Terms of Spatial Pattern and Mechanism in Zhejiang Province

Urban Land Expansion and Regional Inequality in Transitional China

Evaluation on Urban Land Intensive Use Based on Structure-Function Relationship:——A Case Study of Downtown of Wuhan

Research on Land Use Performance and Its Geographical Difference at County Level in Zhejiang

Spatial Difference of Urban Land Intensive Use——A Case Study of Jiangsu Province

Study on Building and Application of the Index System of Evaluating Performance of Urban Land Supply System in China

Effects of Land Use Pattern on Urban Land Intensive Use Evaluation at Different Spatial Scales

Land Intensive Use in City Development Zones Based on Analytic Hierarchy Process: A Case Study of Jiangsu Province

Inequalities of urban green space area and ecosystem services along urban center-edge gradients

Research Progress in Urban Land Use Efficiency

How does geographical environment affect residents' perception of social justice: An empirical study from low-income communities in Beijing

Spatial-temporal differences of land intensive use and economic development:A case study of Jiangsu province

EVALUATION OF LAND USE EFFICIENCY --A CASE STUDY OF JIANGNING COUNTY

Spatial Function Regionalization Based on an Ecological-economic Analysis in Wuxi City, China

Assessment of the Land Use Benefits in a City Scale: a Case Study of Shenzhen

Study on Indicators for Evaluation of Performance of Urban Land Supply System in China——Taking Nanjing As an Example

Spatio-Econometric Analysis of Urban Land Use Efficiency in China from the Perspective of Natural Resources Input and Undesirable Outputs: A Case Study of 287 Cities in China