Effects of Land Use Pattern on Urban Land Intensive Use Evaluation at Different Spatial Scales

曾祥坤,李贵才,赵新平,罗婷文
2009-01-01
Abstract:Scale effects of urban land intensive use evaluation was of utmost importance but are rarely drawn attention in much research.In the present work,the authors selected commonly used land intensive use assessment indices,i.e.,investment per area and output value per area,to investigate intensive use levels of industry plots in Baoan district of Shenzhen City.By comparing the assessment results at neighborhood scale and plot scale,it was found that scale effect clearly existed when the same index was used at different spatial scales to describe spatial characteristics of urban land intensive use.For instance,there showed a relatively high value of investment per area at the plot scale for the region near the boundary between Longhua and Dalang.However,at neighborhood scale,the investment per area of Longhua was ranked two of Baoan district,and Dalang only ranked six of these ten neighborhoods.Furthermore,the authors discussed in detail the influence of land use pattern including land quantity structure and land distribution pattern on the scale effects.First,the plots were classified into several levels by the evaluation indices.Then,land quantity structure of each neighborhood was calculated as the sum of plots'evaluation index value with its area weighted.Last,each neighborhood's pattern index was calculated using Fragstats3.3,namely the Shannon diversity index,dominance index,evenness index and contagion index.Results indicated that land quantity structure leaded to significant effects on urban intensive use evaluation at higher spatial scale,and land distribution pattern determined the spatial form of urban land intensive use(the contagion index was a useful indicator to land aggregation).So some places might show high land intensive use levels at macro-scale,but had no high value plot gathering in micro-scale.In addition,if the land quantity structure of two neighborhoods were similar with each other,the land distribution pattern showed a notable effect on urban land intensive use level.The dominance index and evenness index reflected the importance of reasonable distribution of urban land use.The study suggested that using the same index to evaluate urban land intensive use at different scales would obtain different results or even adverse results.So it would be difficult to evaluate urban land intensive use and obtain reasonable results only by accounting for one scale.It is not appropriate to use evaluation results at one spatial scale to decide land management at another scale.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?